I mean actually looking at individual cases is the way to go, thats the whole point. What i was trying to do was play identity politics the way he does. He generalizes over whole populations, and warns about the replacement of native White European Christians. A group he does not belong to. If we're playing the identity politics game, he is a North African immigrant whose managed to weasel his way into the top of right wing politics. Whether he's a great orator or would chew me up in a discussion is absolutely irrelevant, it doesn't change that he is not a native white european, and if he's really afraid of the threat the natives are being replaced, how is it not a great step from him to say, I'll start with myself first and go back to Algeria, or even Israel if he's afraid of persecution. At least he'd be consistent then.
Btw, i do not disagree with the bolded part. I live in Europe, i lived in Rotterdam before, where some of the worst neighborhoods nobody would go to were Morrocan/Turkish/Surinamese. Is it more significantly likely that an Irishman would assimilate and integrate in France or NL than a Moroccan? Of course it is, you'd have to be so far left to deny that. But you can't condemn a whole people based on that, and you don't make blanket statements about a whole populace. and if we take your point that he's fully assimilated, then he's the best example of that, ironically.