up to the point where it cause a measurable damage to someone, for example you can call a press conference and declare that black people suck, but you can't not hire a black person just because they are black
But then freedom of speach couldn;'t be used in most of the cases about gays in sports? I mean like this article wrote, it looks like this freedom of speace does cose measurable damage.
late me give you an example. when a meteorologist predicts the weather for the next day, he collects some data, runs a model, analyzes the model and makes a prediction. he doesn't sacrifice a lamb or a virgin. that's why god, who allegedly created the atmosphere and all the rest, has no consequence.
Yes, I fully agree on this, we are not talkiing about some religious god. This god we are talking about, started something, he put physics laws, created some matter or whatever, he didn't just look to the universe and said already what was there just nobody knew that it was ther in the first place, like our meteriologist eg, he made things in motion and went on a holiday. That would make everything his consequence? Consequence is the word used for things that happen because of things that couse them right? So didn't this god created physics laws or something similar by which everything goes by, wouldn't that make everything that abides those laws his consequence?