Gay couples as fit to adopt as heterosexuals: study (5 Viewers)

[GordoDeCentral]

Don't make me say correlation does not imply causation

no, restricting definitions to suit ones argument is what is at play here, typical feminist bullshit, woman wants to raise kid alone yet complains about only having one income. Like i said before marriage has very specific and life practical reasons financial is very much an aspect of that.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Seven]

no, restricting definitions to suit ones argument is what is at play here, typical feminist bullshit, woman wants to raise kid alone yet complains about only having one income. Like i said before marriage has very specific and life practical reasons financial is very much an aspect of that.

That I agree with.

 

[ZoSo]

no, restricting definitions to suit ones argument is what is at play here, typical feminist bullshit, woman wants to raise kid alone yet complains about only having one income. Like i said before marriage has very specific and life practical reasons financial is very much an aspect of that.

 

[Azzurri7]

you can interpret the evidence anyway you like fact is you have more chances of being successful in life with a father and a mother, as for homosexual couples any position for it is based solely on theory, theres no real evidence to support as it is too recent of a phenomenon. the real compelling argument for me is would you rather a child live in a home with 2 gay people or in an orphanage/foster home, then the choice is pretty simple.

That's what I was saying yesterday but you explained/put it better.

 

[ALC]

Why do I hate that face so much?

 

[DAiDEViL]

the real compelling argument for me is would you rather a child live in a home with 2 gay people or in an orphanage/foster home, then the choice is pretty simple.

 

[Fake Melo]

You can find people of the same sex attractive, it doesn't mean you want to fuck them. It doesn't mean I want to fuck Ryan Gosling if I say he's attractive.

Or @Azzurri7.. But I probably do want to fuck him

- - - Updated - - -

OK that's enough, Zach.

 

[Azzurri7]

Or @Azzurri7.. But I probably do want to fuck him

Mustache man, I think I'm virtually pregnant now.

 

[Fake Melo]

Mustache man, I think I'm virtually pregnant now.

You got virtual STDs buddy

 

[Enron]

knock yourself out

http://www.fathers.com/statistics-and-research/the-consequences-of-fatherlessness/

What do the statistics say about 2 parent housholds vs 1 parent households, with sex not being part of the equation?

Is it a question of simply not having a father, or not having the stability that a 2 parent household provides?

- - - Updated - - -

Mustache man, I think I'm virtually pregnant now.

If you had a uterus, you be an assembly line for babies.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

What do the statistics say about 2 parent housholds vs 1 parent households, with sex not being part of the equation?

Is it a question of simply not having a father, or not having the stability that a 2 parent household provides?

- - - Updated - - -



If you had a uterus, you be an assembly line for babies.

it was in response to klin questioning why a kid needs both parents, like i said considering the how recent the phenomenon is we wont have as much data to include same sex in the argument.

 

[Trequartista]

What do the statistics say about 2 parent housholds vs 1 parent households, with sex not being part of the equation?

Is it a question of simply not having a father, or not having the stability that a 2 parent household provides?

.

It's probably a bit of both.

 

[JCK]

you can interpret the evidence anyway you like fact is you have more chances of being successful in life with a father and a mother, as for homosexual couples any position for it is based solely on theory, theres no real evidence to support as it is too recent of a phenomenon. the real compelling argument for me is would you rather a child live in a home with 2 gay people or in an orphanage/foster home, then the choice is pretty simple.

Orphanage? Or that wasn't a question?

 

[swag]

Hmmmm...

Less than half British adults under age 24 consider themselves “completely heterosexual”
http://qz.com/484012/less-than-half...-consider-themselves-completely-heterosexual/

 

[king Ale]

Yeah, kinda. It really makes me wonder how you argue with people...I imagine you sitting in a coffee shop with your peers and something comes up that you're really passionate about so you end every argument with "try again". Like huh?

I'm sorry for what i said, and i mean it.

 

[Martin]

Hmmmm...

Less than half British adults under age 24 consider themselves “completely heterosexual”
http://qz.com/484012/less-than-half...-consider-themselves-completely-heterosexual/

Hey, it's a high bar. You have to consistently be attracted to females (or males, as the case may be). People who maybe aren't as interesting as they think they are. Maybe don't cook as well as they think they do. Maybe don't make as good investment decisions as they think they do. And you have to put up with all that....

 

[Seven]

Hey, it's a high bar. You have to consistently be attracted to females (or males, as the case may be). People who maybe aren't as interesting as they think they are. Maybe don't cook as well as they think they do. Maybe don't make as good investment decisions as they think they do. And you have to put up with all that....

Look for better women.

 

[Maddy]

Interesting..

http://www.nature.com/news/epigenetic-tags-linked-to-homosexuality-in-men-1.18530

 

[swag]

People don't get the big picture. I am sure there well may be biological rationalizations for homosexuality as a species. It exists in other species as well. Just don't try telling that to people who don't understand science.

 

[lgorTudor]

People don't get the big picture. I am sure there well may be biological rationalizations for homosexuality as a species. It exists in other species as well. Just don't try telling that to people who don't understand science.

bonobos, everybody's favourite monkeys