Gay couples as fit to adopt as heterosexuals: study (7 Viewers)

[Enron]

I don't disagree with the sentiment. But it's dangerous to set these precedents. I also don't think gay marriage is the same as blatant racism in the public sphere.

Brown v Board of Education wasn't about rasicm amico mio.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[GordoDeCentral]

I don't know and I don't particularly care.

got it, then im sure you were fine with bush and his moral high ground when he waged war for the sake for democracy

 

[Martin]

I don't disagree with the sentiment. But it's dangerous to set these precedents. I also don't think gay marriage is the same as blatant racism in the public sphere.

Maybe not, but discrimination against gays at all levels begins to be comparable with racism, and this is a really strong counterweight to that.

 

[Seven]

Brown v Board of Education wasn't about rasicm amico mio.

Really now?

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Maybe not, but discrimination against gays at all levels begins to be comparable with racism, and this is a really strong counterweight to that.

thats one astronomical leap you made for that conclusion

 

[Seven]

Maybe not, but discrimination against gays at all levels begins to be comparable with racism, and this is a really strong counterweight to that.

Ah. That's something else. The discrimination should be addressed. But do you need gay marriage to do so?

 

[Enron]

got it, then im sure you were fine with bush and his moral high ground when he waged war for the sake for democracy

War is never a moral high ground. Allowing people who want marry the right to marry is.

 

[Martin]

thats one astronomical leap you made for that conclusion

how so

- - - Updated - - -

Ah. That's something else. The discrimination should be addressed. But do you need gay marriage to do so?

Maybe not. But I don't see that it does any harm either.

No law ever accurately addresses whatever needs fixing in society. It's a very hit and miss process, and framing it as marriage just happened to be a winnable battle so that's what they did.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

War is never a moral high ground. Allowing people who want marry the right to marry is.

im sure washington and the rest of the founding fathers disagree with the first part, as for the second part it is just not even worth responding to.

 

[Enron]

Ah. That's something else. The discrimination should be addressed. But do you need gay marriage to do so?

Racism and discrimination aren't issues that can be legislated away. Those are societal problems that may take centuries to change. However, letting people get married is something we can handle as was giving equal rights to men and women regardles of skin color.

- - - Updated - - -

im sure washington and the rest of the founding fathers disagree with the first part, as for the second part it is just not even worth responding to.

You hate the idea of marriage. What do you care?

 

[GordoDeCentral]

how so

- - - Updated - - -



Maybe not. But I don't see that it does any harm either.

No law ever accurately addresses whatever needs fixing in society. It's a very hit and miss process, and framing it as marriage just happened to be a winnable battle so that's what they did.

whats changing the definition of marriage have to do with discrimination?? also show me your evidence for this rampant discrimination that you speak of

 

[Enron]

Really now?

It was an argument of equality.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Racism and discrimination aren't issues that can be legislated away. Those are societal problems that may take centuries to change. However, letting people get married is something we can handle as was giving equal rights to men and women regardles of skin color.

- - - Updated - - -



You hate the idea of marriage. What do you care?

i just care about how it came to pass but yes ibill burr said ti best

 

[Martin]

whats changing the definition of marriage have to do with discrimination?? also show me your evidence for this rampant discrimination that you speak of

show me evidence of this racism you speak of, to me it's all hearsay

 

[Enron]

i just care about how it came to pass but yes ibill burr said ti best

My government agency hate Bill Burr.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

show me evidence of this racism you speak of, to me it's all hearsay

huh? what racism?

 

[Enron]

huh? what racism?

I believe you've been called out good sir.

 

[Martin]

huh? what racism?

racism, it exists. yes?

letting black people vote changed the definition of voting. did you protest that?

 

[GordoDeCentral]

racism, it exists. yes?

letting black people vote changed the definition of voting. did you protest that?

1) quit trying to divert attention from your lack of evidence for the statement you made

2) and no it did not

 

[Enron]

racism, it exists. yes?

letting black people vote changed the definition of voting. did you protest that?

Non-white men gained the right to vote in 1870.