Gay Adoption (4 Viewers)

[swag]

Don't look? Well, I've never seen any couple in my country to be honest. Not anything. And I'm happy about it.

It's not my problem, I'm not sick, they are.

I think short skinny men who have a fetish for grossly fat chicks is sick. But it's out there. It's real. But I don't have to have my society create a pretend make-believe land where I get to deny that this kind of fetish exists.

I'm not talking about people rubbing the other's faces in it, though that's certainly a tactic of some to make extremes so that more relaxed notions seem centrist. But you're basically you want to go blissfully through life with the illusion that gay people don't exist and have never existed throughout history, from Alexander the Great to today.

I don't understand how its intolerant for someone to be uncomfortable with homosexuals but its not intolerant for the pro gay to bash the not pro gay?

I don't think it's intolerant for someone to be uncomfortable with homosexuals at all. I'm uncomfortable with midget guys and large fat chicks. The difference in whether or not I need some legally sponsored illusion that it doesn't exist so I can cope with my life.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[AndreaCristiano]

But the problem isn't that certain folk are just a little uncomfortable with gays, the problem is that this discomfort ends up changing laws and regulations that effect other people who don't have the same insecurities as you and don't want to hear this hate speech.

He didn't mention anything about race. Look up the definition of racism and then come back.

If you want to be accurate its the gays that want laws changed. Same sex marriage, gay adoption all that didn't or doesn't exist. So who is changing the laws?

 

[Cheesio]

Not only racist but arrogant. All the supposed " enlightened " look upon those they don't agree with as bigots and intolerant yet they aren't tolerant of opposing beliefs

Gay parents is just gay.

 

[IrishZebra]

That's racist.

Nope, it isn't. Do tell me how your stance stems from knowledge rather than lack of knowledge.

Extra points if you can tell me what we use poppers for.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

If you want to be accurate its the gays that want laws changed. Same sex marriage, gay adoption all that didn't or doesn't exist. So who is changing the laws?

Changing the laws aren't necessarily a bad thing you know. Human rights...

 

[X Æ A-12]

The problem is psychologically does seeing the opposite of what the child is, assuming the child is heterosexual, disturb or mess up a child's perceptions. This isn't known. Before animals were used as an example animals don't realize or rationalize their homo or hetero relationships. We have reason something animals don't we process things differently we aren't mere animals

That's not true at all actually. There has been plenty of research done in this area and there is absolutely no evidence that having homosexual parents is worse for children or messes up their psychosexual development. Not from any credible sources at least.

 

[X Æ A-12]

If you want to be accurate its the gays that want laws changed. Same sex marriage, gay adoption all that didn't or doesn't exist. So who is changing the laws?

150 years ago, in this country, black people were legally farming equipment. Because something is law does not make it right.

 

[Kate]

The problem is psychologically does seeing the opposite of what the child is, assuming the child is heterosexual, disturb or mess up a child's perceptions. This isn't known. Before animals were used as an example animals don't realize or rationalize their homo or hetero relationships. We have reason something animals don't we process things differently we aren't mere animals

You have no idea what the child is, and neither does anyone else. The sexuality of parents has very, very little to do with how a child develops compared to the actual every day process of parenting. I knew nothing of what my parents did in the bedroom, or what anybody did in the bedroom, and I don't think it was ever my place to know. Their sexuality is something private that goes on between them, and has no bearing on their relationship with their child.

If you want to be accurate its the gays that want laws changed. Same sex marriage, gay adoption all that didn't or doesn't exist. So who is changing the laws?

And when women wanted a right to vote, it was largely women who campaigned for it. Of course they are the ones who want it, they are the ones whose rights are not equal to everyone else's.

 

[swag]

If you want to be accurate its the gays that want laws changed. Same sex marriage, gay adoption all that didn't or doesn't exist. So who is changing the laws?

If we never changed laws, it would still be legal to own slaves.

That's not true at all actually. There has been plenty of research done in this area and there is absolutely no evidence that having homosexual parents is worse for children or messes up their psychosexual development. Not from any credible sources at least.

Because heterosexual couples have done such a flawless job to date of raising kids who aren't messed up.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

150 years ago, in this country, black people were legally farming equipment. Because something is law does not make it right.

 

[Cheesio]

Nope, it isn't. Do tell me how your stance stems from knowledge rather than lack of knowledge.

Extra points if you can tell me what we use poppers for.

What Knowledge there is when talking about such Topic. And your statement was racist.

Poppers are medcine use for some heart desease. What's your point.

 

[AndreaCristiano]

I think short skinny men who have a fetish for grossly fat chicks is sick. But it's out there. It's real. But I don't have to have my society create a pretend make-believe land where I get to deny that this kind of fetish exists.

I'm not talking about people rubbing the other's faces in it, though that's certainly a tactic of some to make extremes so that more relaxed notions seem centrist. But you're basically you want to go blissfully through life with the illusion that gay people don't exist and have never existed throughout history, from Alexander the Great to today.



I don't think it's intolerant for someone to be uncomfortable with homosexuals at all. I'm uncomfortable with midget guys and large fat chicks. The difference in whether or not I need some legally sponsored illusion that it doesn't exist so I can cope with my life.

I'm.not denying its existance at all. I just wonder if this is good for society

 

[AndreaCristiano]

Changing the laws aren't necessarily a bad thing you know. Human rights...

I didn't say it was. I was pointing out that heteros were not the ones changing the law as some here point out

 

[IrishZebra]

What Knowledge there is when talking about such Topic. And your statement was racist.

Poppers are medcine use for some heart desease. What's your point.

How was it racism, Arabs, not a race, Moroccans, not a race.

Racism: The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races

Oh wow, look at that, you're wrong, deal with it.


Popper are used to un-tense the anal passage before sodomy

I didn't say it was. I was pointing out that heteros were not the ones changing the law as some here point out

The polity are changing the laws, they consist of gays,straights and pig fuckers.

 

[swag]

I'm.not denying its existance at all. I just wonder if this is good for society

I'm not sure asking whether it's good or not is the right question. We may as well ask whether or not making public buildings provide wheelchair ramps is good for society.

Certain types of people exist in society, and have throughout history. Whether we find them good or not for society isn't exactly relevant because it's not like we can decide not and they suddenly no longer exist.

 

[X Æ A-12]

I didn't say it was. I was pointing out that heteros were not the ones changing the law as some here point out

Well such a large majority of the population is hetero so in any vote it will be largely a heterosexual decision.

 

[AndreaCristiano]

You have no idea what the child is, and neither does anyone else. The sexuality of parents has very, very little to do with how a child develops compared to the actual every day process of parenting. I knew nothing of what my parents did in the bedroom, or what anybody did in the bedroom, and I don't think it was ever my place to know. Their sexuality is something private that goes on between them, and has no bearing on their relationship with their child.



And when women wanted a right to vote, it was largely women who campaigned for it. Of course they are the ones who want it, they are the ones whose rights are not equal to everyone else's.

So why not polyginists and people who practice beastiality should they have equal rights?

 

[Kate]

So why not polyginists and people who practice beastiality should they have equal rights?

Yes, but bestiality is not a right.

 

[IrishZebra]

So why not polyginists and people who practice beastiality should they have equal rights?

What, like people from Cork?

 

[swag]

I've known more than a few polygamists in my time. And not just the Mormons trying to "protect the family" either.