Gökhan Inler - Central Midfielder - Udinese (24 Viewers)

[GordoDeCentral]

I am not a fan of Inler, but he is better than all the midfielders we have (except Melo). If we are going for Inler, then I wonder why we brought Pirlo, when we have Melo, Marchisio. not to forget Sissoko too, and are we really buying Pazienza?

if we get inler, pirlo is aqua replacement. And if we get rid of melo we deserve to be out of europe again.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[javi_berti]

pirlo provides versaility, for example he can play as a regista, or as a trequartista. something none of our other midfielders offer

i don't see pirlo playing as a trequartista nowadays.

 

[javi_berti]

who thinks melo and pirlo in 2-cm setup could work? i am kind of exploring this idea.

 

[Zacheryah]

who thinks melo and pirlo in 2-cm setup could work? i am kind of exploring this idea.

Then, pirlo would play as bad as the last two years

 

[Snoop]

pirlo provides versaility, for example he can play as a regista, or as a trequartista. something none of our other midfielders offer

but why all the center midfielders, when we will play 4-4-2 and will use only two of them?

if we get inler, pirlo is aqua replacement. And if we get rid of melo we deserve to be out of europe again.

we can't be that stupid to sell Melo, but I won't be surprised if we do

who thinks melo and pirlo in 2-cm setup could work? i am kind of exploring this idea.

Melo and Inler will be great. Not sure about Pirlo, I would use Pirlo as a back up only..

How much he will earn btw, pirlo?

 

[Flamez]

Melo has a weak positioning and he likes too much to go further on the pitch when he shouldn't. It could be a problem. I'd rather use alongside Pirlo a natural DM like Sissoko, but better and also a bit more gifted technically.

 

[javi_berti]

Then, pirlo would play as bad as the last two years

he did not play in a 2-cm midfield with milan.

but why all the center midfielders, when we will play 4-4-2 and will use only two of them?

as for now we have melo, marchisio, pirlo and sissoko

we can't be that stupid to sell Melo, but I won't be surprised if we do

depends on the offers we might receive.

Melo and Inler will be great. Not sure about Pirlo, I would use Pirlo as a back up only..

How much he will earn btw, pirlo?

melo and inler? not enough playmaking skills for my liking. sound defensively but lack the creative aspect.

 

[The Curr]

Melo has a weak positioning and he likes too much to go further on the pitch when he shouldn't. It could be a problem. I'd rather use alongside Pirlo a natural DM like Sissoko, but better and also a bit more gifted technically.

You're saying Sissoko is more positionally disciplined than Melo?

 

[javi_berti]

in a sissoko/pirlo cm it would be easy to disturb the playmaking. just mark or pressure pirlo and there's nobody left to distribute or pass the ball appropriately.

 

[Bjerknes]

What's the big deal? You won't be able to get an in depth analysis but you can get an idea of how Conte likes to run his team.

Not if they play poorly you can't, or if they play their best match of the season. Then if they bottle it and their tactical game collapses, people will call it a failure and start to question why we hired the guy based on one single match. It's the friggin' herd mentality. And on top of that, he might not even deploy the same tactics!

I am not a fan of Inler, but he is better than all the midfielders we have (except Melo). If we are going for Inler, then I wonder why we brought Pirlo, when we have Melo, Marchisio. not to forget Sissoko too, and are we really buying Pazienza?

Pazienza either replaces Sissoko or Melo, which is absolutely retarded in any case.

if we get inler, pirlo is aqua replacement. And if we get rid of melo we deserve to be out of europe again.

Pretty much. I can't understand why we'd want to sell him, he was more consistent than Marchisio or Aquilani this year, but whatever. We like to shoot ourselves in the foot especially when we're drooling over the yet another new Tardelli in Inler.

 

[Bjerknes]

You don't have a "holding" midfielder in a Sissoko - Pirlo midfield. You have a roaming regista along with soccer's version of Ndamukong Suh except virtually useless now.

 

[K.O.]

Melo has a weak positioning and he likes too much to go further on the pitch when he shouldn't. It could be a problem. I'd rather use alongside Pirlo a natural DM like Sissoko, but better and also a bit more gifted technically.

Sissoko is not a football player, he's a headless chicken wearing boots.

 

[Flamez]

You're saying Sissoko is more positionally disciplined than Melo?

No. I'm saying I'd rather get a DM who usually prefers to sit back than going forward to play alongside Pirlo. I don't wanna watch our team surprised by the counters.

I didn't say I want Sissoko, btw.

 

[The Curr]

No. I'm saying I'd rather get a DM who usually prefers to sit back than going forward to play alongside Pirlo. I don't wanna watch our team surprised by the counters.

I didn't say I want Sissoko, btw.

You said "a natural DM like Sissoko". Sissoko is much more likely to go roaming all over the place than Melo is.

 

[javi_berti]

Pazienza either replaces Sissoko or Melo, which is absolutely retarded in any case. Pretty much. I can't understand why we'd want to sell him, he was more consistent than Marchisio or Aquilani this year, but whatever. We like to shoot ourselves in the foot especially when we're drooling over the yet another new Tardelli in Inler.

we don't know what will happen. pazienza might or not be bought. he could also serve as cm depth. remember we might not sign aquilani. and sissoko could be sold and it wouldn't hurt too much as long as we get a decent replacement and i think inler could be one.

 

[The Curr]

You don't have a "holding" midfielder in a Sissoko - Pirlo midfield. You have a roaming regista along with soccer's version of Ndamukong Suh except virtually useless now.

I really don't see any way Pirlo can work in a two-man midfield.

 

[javi_berti]

i was thinking the same all the time. but i like the idea of a 442 with pirlo as playmaker next to a dm. however, it might not work as i'm imagining.

 

[Snoop]

he did not play in a 2-cm midfield with milan.




as for now we have melo, marchisio, pirlo and sissoko




depends on the offers we might receive.





melo and inler? not enough playmaking skills for my liking. sound defensively but lack the creative aspect.

Melo and Inler not enough in playmaking? These duo will probably be the best in terms of playmaking CMs we ever had in this century..

Not if they play poorly you can't, or if they play their best match of the season. Then if they bottle it and their tactical game collapses, people will call it a failure and start to question why we hired the guy based on one single match. It's the friggin' herd mentality. And on top of that, he might not even deploy the same tactics!



Pazienza either replaces Sissoko or Melo, which is absolutely retarded in any case.



Pretty much. I can't understand why we'd want to sell him, he was more consistent than Marchisio or Aquilani this year, but whatever. We like to shoot ourselves in the foot especially when we're drooling over the yet another new Tardelli in Inler.

Pazienza will be stupid indeed.. and I am losing patience on Marchisio too, but we have to keep him for another season, unless we receive a crazy offer from Inter..

 

[Trequartista]

4-3-3

 

[Bjerknes]

we don't know what will happen. pazienza might or not be bought. he could also serve as cm depth. remember we might not sign aquilani. and sissoko could be sold and it wouldn't hurt too much as long as we get a decent replacement and i think inler could be one.

I disagree with the entire premise in signing Pazienza. For whatever purpose it might be, he's not good enough for the team and any deep backup should come from a younger talent. It's not like we have European football to worry about and need a large squad. If we aren't complete trash this year we can evaluate our squad depth next year for Europe because right now, that shit isn't the issue. Quality is.

I really don't see any way Pirlo can work in a two-man midfield.

Agreed.