Franck Ribery (16 Viewers)

[reggaeboy]

Ribery is definitely worth it. The successor to Nedved, as Nedved was to Zidane.

I really don't think Ribery should be compared to Zidane or Nedved. He is definately talented but he sure as hell doesn't have Zidane's skill or Nedved's heart and fighting spirit. He is no successor to Neddy...maybe Camo but definately not our number 11

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[#10]

like oliviera will ever play

But he could come back next season, which is more likely than seeing Kapo and co make a return.

To be honest i wasnt entirely convinced by Olivéra and would prefer players of a higher caliber.

 

[neurosis21]

he will certainly be a very good buy but only at the right price,dont want us to spent excessive amounts of money on a single player

 

[Dominic]

he will certainly be a very good buy but only at the right price,dont want us to spent excessive amounts of money on a single player

Rather one great player than three decent ones.

 

[HelterSkelter]

If there was an option for either Robben or Ribery for the same price,id pick Robben in a heartbeat.I think he's the better player out of the two,but the french connection would enable Ribery to settle better at Juventus.

 

[neurosis21]

Rather one great player than three decent ones.

how about 3 great players at great prices??
asking too much arent i?

 

[Dominic]

I'm afraid you are .

 

[Midzata®]

I think Ribery over Robben & considering Frank's statement he could come to Juve. Even if we do reach Arjen's pricetag I think he wouldn't come to Italy, butt IF we do reach Arjen's pricetag let's hope I'm wrong!

 

[Lion]

Robben is injured way to often and he dives without players even trying to touch him. His crossing and passing are good but Ribery is better. Robben's shot on target is much better than Ribery who can't fininsh. Ribery would miss the goal if he was standing 5 feet infont of the goal with no goalie to stop him.

I'd take either, but I think that Ribery is much more realistic target than Robben.

 

[Midzata®]

Robben is injured way to often and he dives without players even trying to touch him. His crossing and passing are good but Ribery is better. Robben's shot on target is much better than Ribery who can't fininsh. Ribery would miss the goal if he was standing 5 feet infont of the goal with no goalie to stop him.

I'd take either, but I think that Ribery is much more realistic target than Robben.

Aham! A see apoint there....

 

[Daddi]

Neither of them, lets go for Kaká. Since the 'Dinho is coming to Milan

seriously I would want either. Both are really good players and Robben is misused at Chelsea.

 

[pavelnedved]

seriously I would want either. Both are really good players and Robben is misused at Chelsea.

READ: not used

 

[Midzata®]

READ: not used

You got the point, not ever you should see the gramatic point of view!

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

I am not sure about Ribery's loyalty

He is escaped from his last team on free transfer,because club cant pay his wages for a few weeks

I dont want new betrayers

 

[RAMI-N]

I am not sure about Ribery's loyalty

He is escaped from his last team on free transfer,because club cant pay his wages for a few weeks

I dont want new betrayers

you mean the club he played to before going to Marseille ?!

 

[neurosis21]

robben is kind of being wasted at chelsea, hes one of their best players in the entire squad n he hardly plays
and the thing is when he plays you can see that chelsea are doing much better and are more attacking
have no reservations of gettin him

 

[The Arif]

I am not sure about Ribery's loyalty

He is escaped from his last team on free transfer,because club cant pay his wages for a few weeks

I dont want new betrayers

And do you think that we are that kind of club that doesn't pay its players

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

I am not sure about Ribery's loyalty

He is escaped from his last team on free transfer,because club cant pay his wages for a few weeks

I dont want new betrayers

it's called a contract. it is legally binding. would you work for a company that didnt pay you for "a few weeks". no you would start looking for a new company to work with or you would not have any food on the table

 

[Red]

it's called a contract. it is legally binding. would you work for a company that didnt pay you for "a few weeks". no you would start looking for a new company to work with or you would not have any food on the table

Exactly, I don't think we should hold that against him.

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

he does though, because the team is turkish and he is, as you can infer from his nickname, turkish as well