105 mln + Huntelaar means 70 mln for Kaka and 35 mln + Huntelaar for Pato which means that Perez would need to add Huntelaar to the money he paid for Benzema if he wanted to grab Pato
And I still doubt Milan would accept this. They've already rejected bigger offers for Pato.
Benzema is one hell of a player but Perez couldn't grab Pato for 35 mln. Not that Pato is more valuable than Benzema, in fact I believe both Pato and Benzema do cost more than that but snatching the best player of Lyon should logically be easier than buying the best player of Milan.
I don't rate Huntelaar as much as most do.l But he's a good striker who knows where the goal is. I don't rate Borriello all that highly either. I've seen enough of him to make that judgement. He's got nothing on Huntelaar other than having a stronger physique. Huntelaar is the far better finisher, he's got a better first touch and his off the ball movement is also very good.
That is about all Borriello can do. Hold the ball up. Bring up his sole season with Genoa and then you're going to have to tell me why we can't use the same logic to rate James Beattie as a top class striker.
Sure I don't. All I know is that Real would have had to pay more money had Benzema played for one of the BIG clubs of Europe (such as ManU, Chelsea, Milan, Inter, Barca, etc).
Sure I don't. All I know is that Real would have had to pay more money had Benzema played for one of the BIG clubs of Europe (such as ManU, Chelsea, Milan, Inter, Barca, etc).
Thats why i said "you obviously don't know Aulas". If Aulas had Kaka in his team he would probably have sold him for more than Milan did(If he sold him at all). Your logic does not apply to Jean Micheal Aulas.
The most stubborn club president you will ever find. He is Lyon's president. To be fair to him though, he is also the reason Lyon are the superhouse that they are right now.