Yes, I was obviously referring to Suarez.
And I would agree that he has more to his game than Huntelaar (just like say Miccoli has more to his game than Trez, but I'd still prefer Trez no matter what).
The point is that Huntelaar has proven a lot more (in the Dutch league) than Suarez has (till now). Yet a lot of people seem to think that Huntelaar is pretty much worthless while, at the same time, they do rate Suarez. And why exactly do they rate Suarez? Indeed: based on performances in the Dutch league.
Maybe it's me, but I just can't understand that.