FIFA 16 (4 Viewers)

catch22

Senior Member
Aug 23, 2015
557
#65
Inter fans having a fit over Morata being rated higher than Icardi :D

Dybala's stats are really good despite his 78 rating overall
 

duranfj

Senior Member
Jul 30, 2015
8,799
#67
Well I would like to finally be able to play UT just with Juve Players.

in general I really dont expect toó much from UT. EA keep doing all those stuffs to makes this gameplay for kids. They always promise better IA than when 10 yo guys start to complaint they allways do the same stupid gols.... Defense just push R1 till death. Attack just push R2 till death. It's like play fucking Mario soccer
 

Juvellino

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2015
7,145
#68
the Juve ratings they released so far are actually much better than i thought they would give us. usually ea hates us. the ratings could be better but those arent that bad. im looking forward to the demo, but i wont be able to see how our own players faces look cuz we arent in the demo. hopefully we have more real faces of Juve players this year
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,500
#70
Icardi wasn't a big factor in a team that was 1 game away from winning the treble like Morata tho
Icardi scored more consistently then Morata did and was top scorer.


I don't know FIFA stats well but my first reaction wasn't Morata but that first, Chiellini doesn't deserve that.. Secondly Dybala only has 78, kid is supremely skilled and if he has under 80 I'm guessing he won't have good enough dribbling, passing for agility stats.
 

DutchJuventino

Senior Member
Apr 9, 2015
3,936
#72
Massive Serie A upgrades _O_

Sandro & Lichtsteiner: Pace + decent defending :tuttosport:
Chiello & Barza: Good pace for CB and beast defending stats :tuttosport:
Pogba, Pereyra, Marchisio: All 4* skills and 4* weak foot :tuttosport:
That Dybala stats for 78 rated :tuttsport:
That upgrades :tuttosport:
 

catch22

Senior Member
Aug 23, 2015
557
#73
Icardi scored more consistently then Morata did and was top scorer.


I don't know FIFA stats well but my first reaction wasn't Morata but that first, Chiellini doesn't deserve that.. Secondly Dybala only has 78, kid is supremely skilled and if he has under 80 I'm guessing he won't have good enough dribbling, passing for agility stats.
Morata had 13 goals in 2065 minutes (Serie A and CL). A goal every 158 mins.

Icardi had 23 goals 3570 minutes (Serie A and EL). So a goal every 156 minutes (im not including Inter's matches against that icelandic team in EL qualifying)

And the Icardi took penalties, and Inter played some pretty average teams in the EL. Morata is superior when it comes to assists, key passes, chances created, and fouls received.

Dybala's dribbling and passing stats are pretty good. His defensive and strength stats on the other hand are terrible.
 
OP
CrimsonianKing

CrimsonianKing

Count Mbangula
Jan 16, 2013
27,324
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #75
    You guys sound like those 12 years old with their neverending whining about overalls.

    Overalls don't mean shit. Your 81 striker can score as many goals as a 93 Messi, it's about who controls him.

    A CM 80 player with high interception (especially now with the new interception system), strength and short passing will be a better player than a 85 CM with lower interception/st/pass but higher speed/agility/dribbling for the role of your holding mid.

    It's all about the individual attributes for what you want.
     

    catch22

    Senior Member
    Aug 23, 2015
    557
    #76
    He scored three against that Icelandic team in qualifying, but I didn't count that. That team was inferior in Serie D sides

    - - - Updated - - -

    You guys sound like those 12 years old with their neverending whining about overalls.
    .
    People aren't idiots. Overall stats are clearly fairly superficial, but they jump out at you like tits and ass. Hence why people are talking about them
     

    Osman

    Koul Khara!
    Aug 30, 2002
    61,500
    #77
    You guys sound like those 12 years old with their neverending whining about overalls.

    Overalls don't mean shit. Your 81 striker can score as many goals as a 93 Messi, it's about who controls him.

    A CM 80 player with high interception (especially now with the new interception system), strength and short passing will be a better player than a 85 CM with lower interception/st/pass but higher speed/agility/dribbling for the role of your holding mid.

    It's all about the individual attributes for what you want.
    Its entirely about making accurate or realistic enough stats for players. Dont care about FIFA since I dont play it. PES generally tend to have more on point stats distribution (except for young talents/promising players, tend to underrate them criminally).
     
    OP
    CrimsonianKing

    CrimsonianKing

    Count Mbangula
    Jan 16, 2013
    27,324
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #78
    Its entirely about making accurate or realistic enough stats for players. Dont care about FIFA since I dont play it. PES generally tend to have more on point stats distribution (except for young talents/promising players, tend to underrate them criminally).
    A fan of a certain team/player will always be biased towards it. So it's hard to really say what's accurate and what it isn't.

    Sure, some might agree this or that player deserves to have a higher/lower rating but most people won't even look into the individual stats, just the OVR. I've been moderating the EA forums for years now and trust me, UT kids are like that.

    Either way different people will have different opinion on different players/team but that's obvious.

    - - - Updated - - -

    People are idiots.
    Fixed.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)