Fernando Llorente (10 Viewers)

[piotrr]

@Lion i created a special gif for you.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Lion]

+rep

 

[Nzoric]

21 games, 17 as a starter, 10 goals & 3 assists.

Oh Nando

 

[Klovn]

4 assists.

 

[Nzoric]

Either way.

I think he could score 20 in the Serie A alone this season.

 

[Hængebøffer]

Either way.

I think he could score 20 in the Serie A alone this season.

No.

 

[Carlos Primera]

Even on a bad day, I'd play this guy all the time just for the fact he's a constant menace to the opposition whenever a high cross is lobbed into the box.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Even on a bad day where most of his touches aren't going his way and nothing he tries really works, still pops up with a goal to seal the game. Champion. Reminds me of Trezeguet in a way. Real poacher.

Forza Nando and LOL @ lino the Canadian tire hoe.

 

[.zero]

Legend

 

[Hust]

World class

 

[.zero]

Galaxy class 1701-c

 

[Hust]

How much did we buy him for again?

 

[Linebreak]

How much did we buy him for again?

Lots and lots of 0's.

 

[Hust]

Marotta.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

How much did we buy him for again?

 

[Hust]

Can't wait to see who he brings this summer and how many haters will be silenced again.

 

[Bjerknes]

Even on a bad day where most of his touches aren't going his way and nothing he tries really works, still pops up with a goal to seal the game. Champion. Reminds me of Trezeguet in a way. Real poacher.

Forza Nando and LOL @ lino the Canadian tire hoe.

He's a little bit better than Trezeguet with the ball, but he isn't half the poacher. David was the man when it came to positioning and finishing.

However, I still consider Llorente as a poacher. That is the description that makes the most sense. He's not a prototypical target man as he doesn't always play with his back towards goal. He is more like Trezeguet in that he's always looking for angles between the defense as opposed to just sitting stationary. Moreover, he isn't a complete forward either; that would mean he could also dribble and create plays.

He's just a poacher, as Marchisio has said before.

 

[CrimsonianKing]

I've been saying he's a poacher from day one and people insisted in "correcting" me he was a target man. He's just not that typical lying deep type, he can move, track back and hold the ball when needed.

 

[Bjerknes]

I've been saying he's a poacher from day one and people insisted in "correcting" me he was a target man. He's just not that typical lying deep type, he can move, track back and hold the ball when needed.

So have I, people here call us idiots for doing so, who cares. I have seen 22 years of football and it is nonsense to call Llorente a target man; it's even degrading.

 

[Linebreak]

He's a little bit better than Trezeguet with the ball, but he isn't half the poacher. David was the man when it came to positioning and finishing.

However, I still consider Llorente as a poacher. That is the description that makes the most sense. He's not a prototypical target man as he doesn't always play with his back towards goal. He is more like Trezeguet in that he's always looking for angles between the defense as opposed to just sitting stationary. Moreover, he isn't a complete forward either; that would mean he could also dribble and create plays.

He's just a poacher, as Marchisio has said before.

Wait... Marchisio has been posting here?