Fernando Llorente (7 Viewers)

Vialli_92

Senior Member
Mar 7, 2013
6,499
1, would rather play Giovinco
2, would rather play Chiellini as a CF than bring him in
3, playing long balls and crosses all game

Sorry Nando Conte does not rate u at all. Go look for a new team because this coach has lost it with u.
 

Ragazza

Calciopoli Director
Jul 22, 2013
5,060
Might have been different if you guys had been up by a goal or two, but yeah, it would have been a good time to test him out since it didn't really look like Copenhagen were going to score again. It seems like he would rather play with ten men (Giovinco) than throw Llorente in there... I believed everything about the "not match fit" bit but it seems really unrealistic that it would take this long just to be able to play 20-30 minutes. Rossi was out injured for ages for example & he's back, and playing well at that.
 

Rollie

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2008
5,143
Giovinco was actually fine in his role, the attack flowed better after he came on. The ridiculousness was using two of our subs on wing backs, when we're tied with fucking Copenhagen. That De Ceglie sub was so WEAK. Fernando should have been included in this one.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,017
Might have been different if you guys had been up by a goal or two, but yeah, it would have been a good time to test him out since it didn't really look like Copenhagen were going to score again. It seems like he would rather play with ten men (Giovinco) than throw Llorente in there... I believed everything about the "not match fit" bit but it seems really unrealistic that it would take this long just to be able to play 20-30 minutes. Rossi was out injured for ages for example & he's back, and playing well at that.
as soon as conte pulled out the not match fit excuse it was obvious he doesn't think very highly of him. because he is match fit. but whatever. play giovinco and quagliarella instead.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)