Fernando Llorente - ST - Athletic Bilbao (76 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
35,100
That's why I am saying, Marotta wants to implement "the pawn bald guy tactic" in football market.He wants Van Perise or Rooney type players for 15 millions.Well only Moggi did that stuff with Zidane or Davids.And also he totally ignores the thing called "inflation and time value of money".
Well lets not forget he'll be paying €37m combined for Isla and Asamoah.

But somehow he doesnt want to go that extra mile(even its a matter of only a mere few million) when it comes to buying a striker and a quality one at that.
 

juve901

The Strategist
Jul 8, 2008
300

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
I don't believe Marrotta wants Llorente. I think our real target is Dzeko. He seems to be biding his time in this negotiation, waiting on and watching Shitty make a move for Llorente or somebody else.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
If he meant it, this deal would've closed by now considering the only other alternative to Llorente effectively within our price budget and tactically, would be Dzeko. I think the reason he's holding out for e latter is because he perhaps sniffs the possibility of a loan deal with Shitty, and that might also allow him to move for JoJo with Matri/Quag. I don't know, it could be one way of looking at it.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
35,100
If he meant it, this deal would've closed by now
Hmm not really.It seems like we dont want to pay what they're asking.

Also the loan deal for Dzeko is almost impossible..I think we can forget about it.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
Its being reported they want 18m plus a 4m bonus clause. Were offering 16m. It could be bs, but those figures seem realistic and fair. It's too small a difference, and he's a better player than to risk losing out on for 2m, especially since we paid that amount for Matri. The loan for Dzeko is an opportunity that if ever, will only exist in the last 2-3 days of the mercato. The player is completely demotivated, his value has dropped, and a loan could suit both parties. Shitty for their part are analysing who to go for before they make a move. It's pretty clear Marrotta is watching their next move. This is how I'm reading thie situation anyway.

Few scenarios:
A) We agree terms for Llorente with e player, offer an official bid with his team. Shitty develop an interest, and ask us to step aside so its not a bidding war. We could drop our interest despite having made e first move and 'advanced' talks, in exchange for a favourable deal with Dzeko. Taking an unmotivated player off their hands.

B) We actually move for Llorente and close a deal between what we are offering and what they want, or perhaps simply negotiate the bonus clause to suit us better. If this is the case, then this deal won't be dragging on much longer, because the longer we stay in this, the more teams get drawn towards the situation and it creates a demand and bidding war.

C) Marrotta taking the attention off some of our real targets, who we perhaps have no idea about or drawing the attention of some clubs who could be potential rivals for Dzeko's signature to Llorente and his situation at Bilbao.

None of this maybe true, but I'm just saying these are some situations we could imagine developing through these scenarios.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,993
It can appear on 100 websites (as it will, because that is how football sites work) but without any quotes from clubs, player or agents it means nothing.
 

juve901

The Strategist
Jul 8, 2008
300
It can appear on 100 websites (as it will, because that is how football sites work) but without any quotes from clubs, player or agents it means nothing.
Ultimately it means nothing. True. But if reading about speculation bothers you, what are you doing in the transfer thread? For all the direct quotes and hard facts we share on here? Or for us to figure out what reports have more credibility - particularly as we do not work for the club and do not know what exactly is going on?

You will rarely, if ever, get direct quotes from the people directly involved in talks before a deal is either concluded or abandoned, with the exception being that it's essentially done (as with RvP and SAF) or it cannot be done, and those involved state they're out - as it will, because this is how football transfers work.

When something is widely reported on multiple reputable publications, it lends to some credibility. Of course it could be bvllsh!t at the end of the day. As history shows, when something is widely reported, there's usually some kind of substance to it. Papers saying Arsenal are interested in Llorente, is not a major stretch. Let's not be daft.
 

enzo

Senior Member
May 14, 2012
2,976
Its being reported they want 18m plus a 4m bonus clause. Were offering 16m. It could be bs, but those figures seem realistic and fair. It's too small a difference, and he's a better player than to risk losing out on for 2m, especially since we paid that amount for Matri. The loan for Dzeko is an opportunity that if ever, will only exist in the last 2-3 days of the mercato. The player is completely demotivated, his value has dropped, and a loan could suit both parties. $#@!ty for their part are analysing who to go for before they make a move. It's pretty clear Marrotta is watching their next move. This is how I'm reading thie situation anyway.

Few scenarios:
A) We agree terms for Llorente with e player, offer an official bid with his team. $#@!ty develop an interest, and ask us to step aside so its not a bidding war. We could drop our interest despite having made e first move and 'advanced' talks, in exchange for a favourable deal with Dzeko. Taking an unmotivated player off their hands.

B) We actually move for Llorente and close a deal between what we are offering and what they want, or perhaps simply negotiate the bonus clause to suit us better. If this is the case, then this deal won't be dragging on much longer, because the longer we stay in this, the more teams get drawn towards the situation and it creates a demand and bidding war.

C) Marrotta taking the attention off some of our real targets, who we perhaps have no idea about or drawing the attention of some clubs who could be potential rivals for Dzeko's signature to Llorente and his situation at Bilbao.

None of this maybe true, but I'm just saying these are some situations we could imagine developing through these scenarios.
100% agree.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,993
Ultimately it means nothing. True. But if reading about speculation bothers you, what are you doing in the transfer thread?
What I'm doing here is replying to people, that's how a forum works.

For all the direct quotes and hard facts we share on here? Or for us to figure out what reports have more credibility - particularly as we do not work for the club and do not know what exactly is going on?
95% of the stuff posted here and elsewhere ranges from rumours to absolute bollocks, I'm just wondering why you have taken the obvious 'Arsenal are interested in [insert striker]' just as they are selling RVP story as being meaningful. You know, they might actually sign him, but there is nothing to suggest they are interested in him aside from filling in blanks and a regurgitated story across the world. If you post shit 100 times it's still shit, it doesn't become more credible.

Personally I don't believe any of these rumours unless you hear of interest. Agents have limited trust in this respect, because in the end their job is to play clubs off each other, they'll say what they want. Sporting directors often lie and do the same, but they can only get away with so much as fans pick them up on it. If a player comes out and confirms interest then I might sit up and take notice. We can talk about potential deals, but you said:
And it's well-known Arsenal are interested in Llorente.
That's not the case, it is not well-known, just widely reported.

You will rarely, if ever, get direct quotes from the people directly involved in talks before a deal is either concluded or abandoned, with the exception being that it's essentially done (as with RvP and SAF) or it cannot be done, and those involved state they're out - as it will, because this is how football transfers work.

When something is widely reported on multiple reputable publications, it lends to some credibility. Of course it could be bvllsh!t at the end of the day. As history shows, when something is widely reported, there's usually some kind of substance to it. Papers saying Arsenal are interested in Llorente, is not a major stretch. Let's not be daft.
Did you see what happened yesterday with the fake Llorente rumour? Many of these 'reputable' sources are no better than common forums, they just repeat each other's news, no matter how nonsensical it is. Even the BBC had a leading headline a few weeks ago saying we were trying to sign RVP and Suarez together!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 71)