Fabio Quagliarella (55 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
Regarding our strikers, I believe everyone is for sale. The choice who to sell will depend on the offers we will receive and the characteristics of the strikers we will buy. But as of now, everyone has equal chances to be sold.
Teams (read: Marotta) are also paying lots of attention on bookkeeping, so, in order to generate a positive economic effect, we will have to sell the strikers for this amount:
1. Juve signed Quagliarella in 2011 for 10.5m eur (we got him in 2010 for 1 year loan worth 4.5m eur, but that doesn't count). He signed a three year contract. Two years already passed, so in order to be in + we will have to sell Quagliarella for 3.5m eur or more.
2. Juve signed Matri in 2011 for 15.5m eur (we got him 6 months earlier on half year loan for 2.5+Ariaudo). He signed a four year contract. Two years already passed, so in order to be in + we will have to sell Matri for 7.75m eur or more.
3. Juve signed Vucinic in 2011 for 15m eur. He signed a four year contract. Two years already passed, so in order to generate positive economic effect, we will have to sell Mirko for 7.5m eur or more.
4. Juve signed Giovinco in 2012 for 11m eur. He signed a three year contract. One year already passed, so in order to be in + we will have to sell Giovinco for 7.33m eur.
As you can see, Quag is the most attractive selling object, as far as Marotta is concerned
Teams (read: Marotta) are also paying lots of attention on bookkeeping, so, in order to generate a positive economic effect, we will have to sell the strikers for this amount:
1. Juve signed Quagliarella in 2011 for 10.5m eur (we got him in 2010 for 1 year loan worth 4.5m eur, but that doesn't count). He signed a three year contract. Two years already passed, so in order to be in + we will have to sell Quagliarella for 3.5m eur or more.
2. Juve signed Matri in 2011 for 15.5m eur (we got him 6 months earlier on half year loan for 2.5+Ariaudo). He signed a four year contract. Two years already passed, so in order to be in + we will have to sell Matri for 7.75m eur or more.
3. Juve signed Vucinic in 2011 for 15m eur. He signed a four year contract. Two years already passed, so in order to generate positive economic effect, we will have to sell Mirko for 7.5m eur or more.
4. Juve signed Giovinco in 2012 for 11m eur. He signed a three year contract. One year already passed, so in order to be in + we will have to sell Giovinco for 7.33m eur.
As you can see, Quag is the most attractive selling object, as far as Marotta is concerned
Any sales below book value mean that you'll need to adjust (decrease, in this case) said book value, which will have a negative impact on your previous fiscal year. And this will most definitely be taken into account when negotiating to sell a player.
It's also, I believe, the main (if not only) reason why we extended Melo's contract last year.
Of course, this is just accounting. Net book values obviously don't have anything to do with what a player might be worth on the market.
