Yea, I thought we all had warnings sent out about this earlier in the season. Not enough regulation.
He accepted Lazio but the club refused the offer. So I think he's within his rights to refuse a shit club with little prospects. Quag himself requested a move to Sampdoria, so he's not being unreasonable. You have to consider, the destination entails a lifestyle choice too. This is true for all footballers. Vucinic has just refused Arsenal. It's unlikely he'll find a much better club at this point, but he did so for personal reasons.
Truth is most of us would make similar choices in our own careers. You and I would be wrong to make this moral judgment. Most of these players give a lot and sacrifice a lot to get to where they are in their careers. Quag is no different. Do you think Gio would accept a move to Cardiff from Juve when he's done being on the bench at the age of 30? There has to be a semblance of fairness in a proposed move. It's not just related to money.
And once you get to the place you think is the pinnacle of your career, then your next move will always have to have a motivation to it. Whether its money, lifestyle or family. I disagree with you and everyone else who thinks this is a Iaquinta or Amauri situation coz you're forgetting that the latter two were on almost double the salary Quag is on and didn't contribute as much over their careers here. And if you think some players don't deserve to be in top clubs, that's a fair argument but then that holds true for categories of players including the ones who are only here for no other reason but their primavera history.