okay, so let's pollute the paratici thread with the dybala
"discussion" too
1. literally no one confirmed that 15m. unreliable bs that a journalist pulled out of his ass, but nicely fits a narrative.
2. after he carelessly gave away the ball vs lazio, there were at least 6 juve players that could have stopped lazio's attack. but but but dybala
3. at cardiff, we had one single player who showed up (mandzukic

). even that article states that it was bonucci who stirred the shit (and who consequently left the club during the next mercato). but but but dybala.
and i'm not even a fanboy, but these interpretations simply don't make sense. it's like 'he never was a regular goal scorer", "didn't have a single good season", "never scored against an important team", and stuff like that. revisionism at its worse.
now let's get back bashing paratici, that's what this thread is for.
