Fabio Cannavaro (20 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mar 10, 2009
8,684
But this is nonsense. There are threads about Diego and Cassano, but do you see me bashing the board for those transfer rumors? No. Those transfers are fine with me.

Again, this is nothing but bashing the opinions of those who don't agree with the "acceptable" view of the forum, which is quite humorous because you always go on about how you hate those who bash the board.

Same thing, really.

Exactly its not like secco is trying to get the fans happy , a part of me died when I heard rumors that juve were interested in Kuyt.

As for ranieri I don't really mind him, because with the team that we had, I never expected anything at the start of the season.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
But this is nonsense. There are threads about Diego and Cassano, but do you see me bashing the board for those transfer rumors? No. Those transfers are fine with me.

Again, this is nothing but bashing the opinions of those who don't agree with the "acceptable" view of the forum, which is quite humorous because you always go on about how you hate those who bash the board.

Same thing, really.
Since you say it's the same thing that's why I asked you that I'd stop with this crap if you stop also.

Then again in the Cassano and Diego threads or any other transfer link that you fancy, you see these replies like:

"Great signing but we all know the dunderhead Secco will mess it up"

"That would be an amazing addition to the squad but we all know that the retarded coach will stand against it"

You got the drill.

And there is no "acceptable" view of the forums, there are those who bash the board and those who don't.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
Andy, if our budget is only enough to cover a Nedved replacement, a RB and free/cheap CB, do you not think that Cannavaro would be a decent option for a one season 'fix'?

That is the only circumstances under which I would really back this move.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,941
Since you say it's the same thing that's why I asked you that I'd stop with this crap if you stop also.

Then again in the Cassano and Diego threads or any other transfer link that you fancy, you see these replies like:

"Great signing but we all know the dunderhead Secco will mess it up"

"That would be an amazing addition to the squad but we all know that the retarded coach will stand against it"

You got the drill.

And there is no "acceptable" view of the forums, there are those who bash the board and those who don't.
And we also have "Sell Giovinco already" in those threads.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,024
Since you say it's the same thing that's why I asked you that I'd stop with this crap if you stop also.

Then again in the Cassano and Diego threads or any other transfer link that you fancy, you see these replies like:

"Great signing but we all know the dunderhead Secco will mess it up"

"That would be an amazing addition to the squad but we all know that the retarded coach will stand against it"

You got the drill.

And there is no "acceptable" view of the forums, there are those who bash the board and those who don't.
But that's the truth. Unless you think Ranieri is a liar. Do you think Ranieri is a liar?

I don't even know if I said those things to be honest, but perhaps I did.

But still, in this thread, you don't offer anything.

You're just as bad as those who bash the board nonstop by claiming people like me are against the Canna signing just because the board wants it.

You're not a fucking retard, Jack. Don't fucking act like one.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,024
Andy, if our budget is only enough to cover a Nedved replacement, a RB and free/cheap CB, do you not think that Cannavaro would be a decent option for a one season 'fix'?

That is the only circumstances under which I would really back this move.
You might as well not even pay the wages then. Keep the centerbacks we have and bring back Criscito.
 

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
1- He has over 120+ Caps with the Azzurri team (like that dude said the other day) :lol2:
And here comes that dude. :shifty: You asked me to define expierence in the case of Cannavaro - i did it, and it's true, but you seem to have no brains whatsoever and keep bringing it up like brainless garbage lover. How will this expierience help us? Hell, if it helps Azurri (right now, not back in 2002) to reach good things, than what are your arguments against it? Our other non-italian defenders are THAT superior? If everything you bring to the case are childlish splattering and lots of smilies, than i can't understand how can you still be a mod nor how did you fucking learned another language, you can't be that dumb. Now you will start to fuck around about how Real conceded 6? Then let me ask you a question - is it more clever to predict that Cannavaro will play at Juve like he played at useless RM side who plays whole different football with whole different (and wrong tonight) tactics, or he will play at Juve like he played with Italian NT with Chiellini alongside him and Buffon at back? Now tell me which comparison is smarter? There's not much you could set against each other in Spain's and Italy's football. Another point - i never said he should be our only defensive signing, but centre-back's are not the only position at back four. Bring Canna for free and improve our drastic fullbacks, or bring, let me say, Alex for crazy money, and next year start with Grygera - Alex - Chiellini - Molinaro, your choice would be? Second probably wouldn't cost just the money allocated to fullbacks. And stop that smilie attack, that's really irritating.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,937
Todays defeat for Real Madrid has no relevance on us signing Cannavaro. He was in an awful team performance against a fantastic team performance. Prior to this game he has shown he has found his feet in Spain.
 

The Curr

Senior Member
Feb 3, 2007
33,705
Andy, if our budget is only enough to cover a Nedved replacement, a RB and free/cheap CB, do you not think that Cannavaro would be a decent option for a one season 'fix'?
I don't think he would be because he'd expect to play and he would play but, IMO he's worse than Legro.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,024
Todays defeat for Real Madrid has no relevance on us signing Cannavaro. He was in an awful team performance against a fantastic team performance. Prior to this game he has shown he has found his feet in Spain.
Yeah, sure he has. Three years of subpar performances really show he's found his feet.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,941
So we can get a player we can use all the time, every match.
But Giovinco is not taking anyone's place. He's a reserve anyway. He can be a reserve to the guy who'll replace Nedved.
Why sell him then?

I find it illogical to wish Giovinco to be sold and to keep repeating that over and over again throughout the season.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,382
But that's the truth. Unless you think Ranieri is a liar. Do you think Ranieri is a liar?

I don't even know if I said those things to be honest, but perhaps I did.

But still, in this thread, you don't offer anything.

You're just as bad as those who bash the board nonstop by claiming people like me are against the Canna signing just because the board wants it.

You're not a fucking retard, Jack. Don't fucking act like one.
I told you once that my opinion about this transfer was already mentioned in the first two pages of this thread but you didn't bother look it up. Here it goes:

As much as I hate it to see him back, he'll be just perfect to teach the youngsters (Chiellini included) how to defend.
What happened is that since we were relegated we never had a commanding defender. Both Thuram and Cannavaro left and we were forced to rely on Boumsong, Andrade, Chiellini, Legro, Stendardo, Knezevic and some primavera players. I think what happened now is that we realized the need to have a veteran defender to educate the line on how things are. It is always the case, you can't just buy two defenders and expect them to do wonders.
Then there's the fact that I don't watch La Liga, I never did and never will and I have it extensively covered for free on my cable provider.

You expect us to buy a right midfielder, a left midfielder, a play maker, two full backs and a center back, all top notch players, passers of the ball and able to turn things around. I, on the other hand, know that the world is passing an economic crisis (which you are very much aware of) and I am also aware that this crisis affects football clubs as well; unless football clubs follow the economy of Neptune. In addition to the economic crisis we are a club that lacks a sugar daddy and we are just starting to recover from a relegation. Signing one or two players for temporary purposes is not harmful, on the contrary it is healthy.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,024
But Giovinco is not taking anyone's place. He's a reserve anyway. He can be a reserve to the guy who'll replace Nedved.
Why sell him then?

I find it illogical to wish Giovinco to be sold and to keep repeating that over and over again throughout the season.
But that's the thing, it's illogical in the first place to keep him on the bench.

Obviously, if we have our hearts set on benching him anyway, then why not sell him for a grand fee and bring in a player we would field?

That's the logical thing to do, isn't it?

Instead of questioning the stupidity of what I'm saying, question why the kid isn't a starter.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,937
Yeah, sure he has. Three years of subpar performances really show he's found his feet.
You know that saying means in recent terms. I suppose you could compare him against some of the crap he plays with (Metzelder, Heinze - two players linked to Juve before) and say it isn't hard to look good alongside them, but really Real Madrid are a very poor defensive side because of their whole approach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 20)