Euro 2024 General Discussion Thread (44 Viewers)

Alin

FINO ALLA FINE!
Jul 27, 2015
6,390
They also mentioned on twitter that one of the reasons it wasnt varred is because initial pass was offside
This is the reason why it wasn't a penalty.
Anyway I'm amazed how so many people thought that wasn't a handball penalty.
Also I got to give Taylor an apology because I just thought he and VAR ref were dumb.
It’s the only sensible explanation tbh.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,891
Anyway I'm amazed how so many people thought that wasn't a handball penalty.
I still don't get the logic behind the "clear penalty". Cucurella’s hand was moving toward his body and was pointing downwards. That showed, imo, a clear intention not to stop the ball. Defenders can't go running around all the time with their hands behind their back. They put them there only when they predict/see that there's gonna be a shot. When Cucurella saw that Musiala will shoot, he tried to put his hand next to his body, or behind his back, but while trying to do that the ball hit his hand.

It was a very tricky situation because it probably prevented a goal, so it was gonna be hard to argue against a penalty if given, but, if awarded, Cucurella would have been punished for trying to do the right thing, i.e. not to stop the ball with his hand/arm.
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,469
I still don't get the logic behind the "clear penalty". Cucurella’s hand was moving toward his body and was pointing downwards. That showed, imo, a clear intention not to stop the ball. Defenders can't go running around all the time with their hands behind their back. They put them there only when they predict/see that there's gonna be a shot. When Cucurella saw that Musiala will shoot, he tried to put his hand next to his body, or behind his back, but while trying to do that the ball hit his hand.

It was a very tricky situation because it probably prevented a goal, so it was gonna be hard to argue against a penalty if given, but, if awarded, Cucurella would have been punished for trying to do the right thing, i.e. not to stop the ball with his hand/arm.
Intention doesn't matter in this case.
He should be with his hands behind his back , not with them flailing around stopping shots on goal.
The only time when it is not given is when the defender uses his hand for balance and cucurela had plenty of balance.
And I am not saying this as a personal opinion .
The rules says it.
 

Alin

FINO ALLA FINE!
Jul 27, 2015
6,390
I still don't get the logic behind the "clear penalty". Cucurella’s hand was moving toward his body and was pointing downwards. That showed, imo, a clear intention not to stop the ball. Defenders can't go running around all the time with their hands behind their back. They put them there only when they predict/see that there's gonna be a shot. When Cucurella saw that Musiala will shoot, he tried to put his hand next to his body, or behind his back, but while trying to do that the ball hit his hand.

It was a very tricky situation because it probably prevented a goal, so it was gonna be hard to argue against a penalty if given, but, if awarded, Cucurella would have been punished for trying to do the right thing, i.e. not to stop the ball with his hand/arm.
Did the hand help him extend the length of his body to be able to block a shot aimed at goal that otherwise he couldn’t have come close to blocking? Yes. Did the shot have any deflection or ricochet off his leg? No. Was it shot from extremely close proximity? No. Do defenders usually keep their hands tucked in when attempting to stop a shot? Yes and it was not the case here as his hand was sideways in the air and in the trajectory of the shot, with the intention not being relevant at this stage as most handballs in the box are usually unintentional other than a few rare exceptions.

That’s a PK for handball each and every time, we’d all be fuming if Juventus would have been refused the same call while you can also rest assured it would have always been awarded against us.
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,469
Anyway, what a boring 90 minutes between France and Portugal .
You would think that with all the quality that both teams poses that it would turn out classic game ,yet in parts it looked like a Serie B match.
 

Alin

FINO ALLA FINE!
Jul 27, 2015
6,390
I wasn't referring to you specifically :D
Well it’s only a couple of us discussing it right now so seems like you are pointing at us.

Anyway, what’s your opinion on it now that you are here? :lol:

- - - Updated - - -

Anyway, what a boring 90 minutes between France and Portugal .
You would think that with all the quality that both teams poses that it would turn out classic game ,yet in parts it looked like a Serie B match.
Second half was more entertaining with big chances for both sides, both GK’s did an amazing job to keep it 0:0 at that point, but aside from those select minutes when both teams seemed to go for it the rest was rather dull and low risk for the majority of it.
 
OP
Bianconero81

Bianconero81

Ageing Veteran
Jan 26, 2009
40,170
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #3,272
    Well it’s only a couple of us discussing it right now so seems like you are pointing at us.

    Anyway, what’s your opinion on it now that you are here? :lol:
    I think the rule is ridiculous, but it's a clear penalty. Nonetheless, if the German player was in an offside position, it's a moot point.

    Overall, perhaps Germany deserved it more, but they got lucky against Denmark, and Spain have been the best/most convincing team throughout the entire tournament. I have no idea why their coach took off Morata, Nico, and Yamal - pussy tactics.
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    53,891
    Did the hand help him extend the length of his body to be able to block a shot aimed at goal that otherwise he couldn’t have come close to blocking? Yes. Did the shot have any deflection or ricochet off his leg? No. Was it shot from extremely close proximity? No. Do defenders usually keep their hands tucked in when attempting to stop a shot? Yes and it was not the case here as his hand was sideways in the air and in the trajectory of the shot, with the intention not being relevant at this stage as most handballs in the box are usually unintentional other than a few rare exceptions.

    That’s a PK for handball each and every time, we’d all be fuming if Juventus would have been refused the same call while you can also rest assured it would have always been awarded against us.
    Intention doesn't matter in this case.
    He should be with his hands behind his back , not with them flailing around stopping shots on goal.
    The only time when it is not given is when the defender uses his hand for balance and cucurela had plenty of balance.
    And I am not saying this as a personal opinion .
    The rules says it.
    I'm googling the incident. I can't find anything about an offside being the reason for the disallowed goal, but there are a lot of similar/same explanations why the handball wasn't called.
    It's pretty much the same with what I am saying. And also this:
    "In the pre-tournament briefing, Roberto Rosetti, UEFA's head of referees, gave specific examples of handball penalties. Rosetti showed a clip of the ball hitting a defender's arm which was in a vertical position, close to the body. He said this should not be a penalty and if the arm is close to the body, and not extended to create what could be deemed a barrier, this should not be punished."
    "UEFA's pre-tournament briefing on handballs gave a specific example just like Marc Cucurella, saying it should NOT be a handball penalty," Johnson said. "Arm close to the side, pointing predominantly down/vertically, and/or a position behind line of the body."
     

    kappa96

    Senior Member
    Jun 20, 2018
    7,469
    Wasn’t he given a one game suspension due to some gestures he made at the end of the last game? His arrogance is off the roof lately.
    Nah I think he is cleared to play ,but demiral got a suspension .
    I think Bellingham got a fine.
    He is acting like a real prima dona , like he is playing in some peasent league and whenever he gets touched he should get a foul .

    - - - Updated - - -

    1720246139517.png

    1720246178692.png


    - - - Updated - - -


    "Offside" will probably be the official explanation for the ref's decision, but situations like this one should force UEFA to update the penalty rules for cases like this one.
    I don't think they can change this one.
    Unfortunately it comes down to referee bias.
    If a referee has favorites like merda with some peasent team he will not give it .
    If it's against Juve it's gonna be a penalty 100%.
    I don't know if we can eliminate human bias from the game.

    Like with Anthony Taylor , last seconds of the game Kroos blatantly fouls Merino at the 16 yeards box , no foul , then a Spanish player 5 seconds later fouls Kroos the same way as he was carrying the ball out of defense , but Taylor blows for a foul this time .
    Definetly human bias at it's finest.
     
    Last edited:

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 31)