Erling Braut Håland - Striker - Red Bull Salzburg (7 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
May 23, 2011
22,606
I think Keane was seriously over rated tbh.
Indeed. There is serious misconception about how Juve handles young players. Kean wasnt good enough , not enough facets in his game to warrant more playing time so he was shipped out when a good offer arrived. This Halaand guy, based on the little Ive seen in CL, looks like infinitely more exciting prospect. He smashed in CL, in his first season so Im looking forward to see the impact he is going to have here.
 

Snobist

DareDevil
Apr 16, 2017
13,287
Sass will be happy about this. They do need a young striker. Even Atalanta will like this. I dont think Paratici cares about strengthening Juve’s attack. He sees a great plusvalenza potential in this guy.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,412
Haaland is not an investment, he is a risk, he is hyped, he could become more expensive in the future and bring profit. But don't forget that he is a one season wonder and we are Juventus, the Juventus that plays in Serie A, the Juventus that ruins youngsters and don't give them opportunities, the Juventus that made toothless one of the most prolific forwards of all times.
And Haaland will have to compete with all those guys right away.
It will be nigh impossible to find the place to sign with us and his market value will drastically fall, as he doesn't have an established career to help him survive that.
Also, this 30+15mil +salaries investment will crop our available capital and rob us of any chances to buy the midfielder we need. We are repeating the same mistakes over and over again, wasting money on opportunity targets, not getting our primary targets and then suffer from it.
We don't have those 30mil to spare, as we can only afford free midfielders like Rabbiot and Ramsey.
Add to that the extremely high chances that we will ruin the kid due to the currently overstocked star forward line and you have an explosive cocktail.
Remember early Man City? They had loads of star forwards but achieved nothing until they got the midfielders to serve them. We must not repeat the same mistakes, we cannot afford them!

Every we spend like 100-150mil plus what we get from sales and we keep sucking hard at sales, what profit we make, is from our best talents. We always waste a chunk of our budget to manager dictated useless transfers, don't expect this to chance, the forward and CB lines are stacked, we need a creative midfielder and the likes of the SMS, Pogbs etc will cost like 100-120mil, this should be our priority right now and then, maybe, we can afford to gamble such moves
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,819
Ive never understood that mentality. Juventus at least seemed to be moving forward with Keane and then signing DeLigt. But no one can honestly say this guy is going to start over Higuaín, Dybala, or Ronaldo on a consistent basis
Not this season of course, but starting as soon as next season.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
31,783
Haaland is not an investment, he is a risk, he is hyped, he could become more expensive in the future and bring profit. But don't forget that he is a one season wonder and we are Juventus, the Juventus that plays in Serie A, the Juventus that ruins youngsters and don't give them opportunities, the Juventus that made toothless one of the most prolific forwards of all times.
And Haaland will have to compete with all those guys right away.
It will be nigh impossible to find the place to sign with us and his market value will drastically fall, as he doesn't have an established career to help him survive that.
Also, this 30+15mil +salaries investment will crop our available capital and rob us of any chances to buy the midfielder we need. We are repeating the same mistakes over and over again, wasting money on opportunity targets, not getting our primary targets and then suffer from it.
We don't have those 30mil to spare, as we can only afford free midfielders like Rabbiot and Ramsey.
Add to that the extremely high chances that we will ruin the kid due to the currently overstocked star forward line and you have an explosive cocktail.
Remember early Man City? They had loads of star forwards but achieved nothing until they got the midfielders to serve them. We must not repeat the same mistakes, we cannot afford them!

Every we spend like 100-150mil plus what we get from sales and we keep sucking hard at sales, what profit we make, is from our best talents. We always waste a chunk of our budget to manager dictated useless transfers, don't expect this to chance, the forward and CB lines are stacked, we need a creative midfielder and the likes of the SMS, Pogbs etc will cost like 100-120mil, this should be our priority right now and then, maybe, we can afford to gamble such moves
Pogba and De Ligt both became starters for us. Pogba due to his sheer ability and marchisio being injured in 2013, and de ligt similar but more due to chiellini injury. both became starters for us at 19 years old
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
31,783
Pogba and De Ligt both became starters for us. Pogba due to his sheer ability and marchisio being injured in 2013, and de ligt similar but more due to chiellini injury. both became starters for us at 19 years old
actually also dybala was a starter for us at 21 years old. same as marchisio as a 20 year old. same thing with chiellini at 21

thise whole notion that juventus ruins youngsters is false. they only get rid of ones who arent good enouough like kean and criscito. whcih is same as any other big club really

they (juve management) just like any other big club, will buy a youngster if they think the will be a starter/first team option for us whether right away or in a season. just like any other big club

- - - Updated - - -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)