Morsi should be released why, exactly? Once the next elections are held and there is some stability in the country he should face his crimes before a jury. You can't let a criminal back into politics, Egypt might be fucked but it ain't Italy.
Then your problems will not be solved soon.
Differences between Turkey and Egypt
http://todayszaman.com/columnistDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=320148
A newspaper that reported on the coup in Egypt by running the headline "Tayyip of Egypt gone," by referring to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, represented the mentality of the opposition.
In Turkey, comparisons between Egypt and Turkey are widespread. These comparisons also nurture the hope that the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) might be overthrown via a coup as was the case with the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) in Egypt. To what extent is such a comparison appropriate? Will Erdoğan and Mohammed Morsi share similar fates in the short term? Is it likely that Turkey's ruling party, which seems impossible to challenge in elections, will be overthrown via a coup?
A structural and actual comparison between the Turkish and Egyptian armies is enough to show that there is no similarity between the two cases. The Egyptian army works like a giant corporation. The Egyptian economy is largely controlled by the army. The army governs the country not only with its weapons, but also with the tools afforded it by this economic power. In the past, the traditions of the Turkish army prevented it from acquiring the tools enjoyed by the Egyptian army. In the wake of the coup of May 27, 1960, the Turkish army established an economic enterprise known as the Turkish Armed Forces Assistance Center (OYAK). This corporation benefitted from major tax exemptions and became one of the prominent holdings in Turkey. Still, the Turkish army never enjoyed the power the Egyptian army acquired by leveraging its economic tools.
The Turkish army has staged four coups since 1960. But the Egyptian army staged its second coup on Wednesday. There is one simple difference. The Egyptian army didn't allow a transition back to democratic life after the coup. The Turkish army returned to its barracks after each coup, with the longest coup regime lasting two years at most. The Egyptian army is a full-fledged Third World army. It acts as an interest group, using its weapons to control political power. The Turkish army, in contrast, has limits coming from its strong traditions. In addition, it is a NATO army. A military dictatorship is not very likely to continue to be a member of the military alliance of democratic countries.
Actually, the differences are more profound. The ruling AK Party gradually eliminated the army's clout over civilian politics. The members of the army which sought to manipulate the government's policies are jailed or on trial. This deterrence is powerful enough to destroy any possibility of a coup. The Egyptian army only handed political power over to Morsi in the face of US pressure. During the last one-and-a-half years, nothing was done to curtail the army's power.
Egypt and Turkey's political atmospheres are radically different as well. If sufficiently longer time had been given, the MB would most likely have been defeated in the next elections. This would help the culture of democracy take root in Egypt. Perhaps, the army saw this risk and stepped in to change the government in order not to lose its power. In the short term in Turkey, it seems impossible to challenge the ruling AK Party in the elections. The opposition parties fail to offer a good alternative to the ruling party. The reasons why criticisms against the ruling party in Turkey tend to go out of democratic boundaries and why certain groups long for a coup are the lack of alternatives and despair.
Turkey and Egypt have largely parallel histories. The first Turkish coup in 1960 was conducted by taking the 1953 Egyptian coup as a model. In our time, Egypt took Turkey as a model for its short-lived democratic experience. It follows that Turkey is a model for democracy, while Egypt is a model for coups. And today, their historic conditions do not resemble each other.