Egypt: from 2011 demonstrations to today (34 Viewers)

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
Also, would you still oppose the coup if it was triggered by MB fans protesting in the streets and against a secular government? Don't misuse the terms you do not believe in yourself and then you may be taken more seriously. You can argue that MB must have stayed at power or that they are what Egyptians need but to cry over a coup because it's deposed a "democratically" elected government only makes you look like a hypocrite.
there is no such thing as a good coup and 1000% yes to your question (although it was directed at Turk).

when you steal an elected government's mandate then things will only get worse, if not immediately but certainly in the long term.
 
Jul 2, 2006
18,850
imaginary then. at least give me a link.



a year old article but quite informative about armed thugs

Egypt military's economic empire

Calls for accountability and transparency grow at a time the military has fallen out of favour with the public.

The military’s vast economic interests in Egypt are one of those secrets which is not really a secret. Their social clubs, complexes, villages and products are clear for all to see, but their precise hold on the country’s economy has never been determined.

Analysts have predicted the Egyptian military control anything from 15 per cent to 40 per cent of the economy. Even those are wild estimates.

Khaled Fahmy, head of history at the American University in Cairo, calls it a “grey economy, in the sense that we know very little of them, they are not subject to any Parliamentary scrutiny, the Egyptian government auditing office has no control or knowledge of them".

The military has, over decades, created an industrial complex that is well oiled and well funded. In over 35 factories and companies it produces everything from flat-screen televisions and pasta to refrigerators and cars.

It owns restaurants and football grounds. Much of the work force are conscripts paid below the average wage. And it is not just manufactured goods: the military provide services, managing petrol stations for example.

The influence extends far beyond Cairo across Egypt. They are huge land owners in the country.

Prime real estate

We do not know exactly how much land military personnel own, but do a quick drive through Nasr City in Cairo and look at the prime real estate in army hands.

They also speculate on the value of land which has proven very lucrative for them. So too have the joint ventures they have entered into with construction companies building resorts and other complexes.

Their soldiers live in their own mini villages. The army has become a separate entity untouchable by the state with an anaudited economy.

The Egyptian military consists of almost half a million conscripts. They have not fought a war since 1973 and are well funded. These soldiers need to be placated and controlled.

Fahmy explains how under Mubarak a tight lid was kept on his officer corps because of the deep and historic anxiety of a coup [after all it was a coup in 1952 which brought the army to power in the first place].

“Mubarak made sure his high brass are loyal to him and he made sure his mid-ranking officers were put under tight control and one way to do this was to force them into retirement when they get to the age of 50, then the question is what do you do with all these retired officers?”

It’s estimated that up to 250,000 officers were retired under the 30 years of Mubarak’s presidency - a huge number of men and families that needed to be placated and one way was to open up prospects of employment for them after retirement.

Reward for officers

Under Nasser, ex army officers would be rewarded by being given ministerial positions or positions in the provincial governorates.

Under Sadat and Mubarak, Fahmy explains, that was not the preferred options to placate officers and so Sadat and even more so Mubarak would reward army officers by inserting them into this empire and service industry, and reward police officers with political positions.

The military’s economy, like its political dealings is more under the spotlight now than it has ever been. On a grassroots level groups like April 6 are starting a campaign to boycott army made products.

As one member, Salem Mahmoud puts it:“Just like we’re trying to bring them down politically, now we’re also trying to do it economically and redistribute the wealth to the people.”

But the boycott is still at an infant stage, and unlikely to get much traction amongst the majority of the population.

What is of increasing concern to the Generals is the possibility of increased oversight of their budget in parliament. Back in November the government [and, by extension, the army] tried to pass through a constitutional declaration which [amongst other things] would have ensured the army’s budget would remain autonomous and under their direct control.

Critical issue

The people rose up and the declaration never passed, but it was an indication of just how critical the issue of their economy is to the military establishment, and the concern over an elected authority scrutinising it.

So far it does not seem like the new parliament, dominated by Islamists, will want to pick a fight with the army over where it gets it’s money.

But if Egypt is going to be a true democracy complete with transparency of it’s institutions, at some point the military will have to diverge some of it is business dealings and its privileges [subsidies, tax breaks] will be questioned.

In countries around the world the military enjoys a degree of benefits and even secrecy in its operations.

In Egypt where the army is already in hot water with the population, calls for accountability and transparency are growing.

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/02/2012215195912519142.html
 

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,541
this coup is a shame but it would have been a bigger shame to see a non-democrat ruin the growing democratic development of egypt.

hopefully the new government, when elected, will do a better job respecting the democratic values than morsy.

and bitch please to those arguing from a democratic view point yet have no respect nor regards towards democracy.
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
Egypt's coup: a ruinous intervention
Those who believe the Egyptian army's priority is to preserve freedom will soon be disappointed


Whether the Egyptian army's actions today and over the previous two days amount to a full-scale military coup can be debated. But what is clear beyond doubt is that they amount to a ruinous intervention in the politics of a country that had breathed the air of democracy for the first time for decades.

An army that appeared to be retreating from politics after the departure of Hosni Mubarak in February 2011 has stepped back into the arena again, first by issuing an ultimatum to an elected president to obey it or resign, and then by going through with its threat and laying out a road map that deposes him and suspends the constitution.

Rejecting the results of elections that were widely deemed to be free and fair and setting aside a country's basic law is a step that no army should ever take. The fact that the army's move has been welcomed by many of the revolutionaries who first had the courage to go into the streets against Mubarak in 2011 is a desperate commentary on their political naivety and shortsightedness.

This is not to say that President Mohamed Morsi is blameless. The political charge sheet against him is long and detailed, the worst offence being his issuance last November of high-handed decrees to extend his powers. But he quickly rescinded them after protests. During the latest turmoil on the streets, in spite of his defiant words about being ready to die, he again showed a willingness to compromise by offering to form a government of national unity and accelerate elections to a new parliament. But to make him entirely responsible for the disappointments of the past two years is absurd. It was not he but the supreme administrative court that dissolved the people's assembly, the lower house of parliament. It is not he but the leaders of the opposition parties who produced a government that was largely dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood. Morsi invited them to join the cabinet but they refused.

It certainly isn't the president who should be blamed for the failure of the Egyptian economy to provide enough jobs for tens of thousands of young people who are graduating every year, let alone for an older generation that is out of work. Morsi went along with the International Monetary Fund's plans for an end to subsidies on food and utility prices that would only create more austerity, but so did most of the established opposition leaders who are now clamouring for power. As for the failure of the tourism sector to revive, the main reason for the chaos and instability that put off outsiders rests with the constant street provocations of demonstrators.

Much has rightly been made of the threat to Egyptian democracy that comes from the so-called deep state: the still entrenched bureaucracy made up of officials of Mubarak's National Democratic party, elitist entrepreneurs who were his cronies, and an army hierarchy that exploited state assets or profited from newly privatised industries and trading companies. Some accused Morsi of joining the ranks of this authoritarian elite. But the real charge was that he did too little to challenge them or their footsoldiers, a corrupt and brutal police force. The irony of the events of the past few days is that those who are so energetically denouncing the president in Tahrir Square and the streets of other cities are falling into the trap made by the very elite they want to bring under control.

It is true that the Muslim Brotherhood and its supporters are social conservatives who may pose a threat to some Egyptians' civil rights. But the biggest and most immediate danger to the country is to the political rights that all Egyptians won with the overthrow of Mubarak. The abolition of one-party rule, the right of all kinds of political groups to organise freely, the lifting of media censorship, and the virtual curtailment of imprisonment for dissent are benefits that should not be abandoned lightly.

Those who believe that the military's main objective is to preserve the new freedoms will soon be disappointed. From Chile in 1973 to Pakistan in 1999 (and several times before that), long is the history of military takeovers that were welcomed in their first hours and days but regretted in the years of despair that followed. For Egypt to follow in that tradition is a disaster.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jul/03/egypt-coup-ruinous-army
 

Bisco

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2005
14,384
What kind of logic is that? There are two examples of armies turned against their people, Egypt and Syria, and they are sided with minorities.

what minority?!?!? turk you r clueless i suggest you sit and care about your country bec you:

1- dont want to believe people who live in this country
2- you r obessed with idea's that are not only wrong they r untrue.

i will not reply to any of your posts in this thread, so i don't lose you as a friend at least in this forum. :)

you know what egypt is, and you know why egypt is the biggest country in the region. if you don't, read the holy Quran and you will know why. the people of this country love it to bits even when life sucked big time, and life was harsh and all they wanted to do was leave there is a strong bond in this country between the people and there army, and the people and the land of this country.

as for the egyptain military who according to you has only one accomplishment the 6 day war. thanks you, for you stooping to this low level, read the holy prophets hadith regarding the egyptain army :) and its coptic people i,e the Christians who are the origianl settlers of this country. as for the miniority i think you r mistakened but there is no point arguing that with you. you have your head locked regarding this.

- - - Updated - - -

two can play this game :) but i like i already said will not respond to you. keep posting what ever it is you r posting bec you will never believe anything and you choose what u want to believe bec you r taking sides when this has nothing to do with u or your people.

- - - Updated - - -

one very last thing turk, the truth will be released soon and you will know many things like who killed our soliders while they were haviing iftar in ramadan of last year in rafah on the border with gaza and why this gruesome crime happened. this is a tiny thing you will find out about the people you r supporting with out knowing there history or the facts on the ground.

@Snoop: forgive me, only today i understood you :)
 

Bisco

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2005
14,384
the army detained groups from el qassem brigade :) borders with gaza tightened. this is how the palestinian cause is being traded with.


- - - Updated - - -

the army detained groups from el qassem brigade :) borders with gaza tightened. this is how the palestinian cause is being traded with.



picture: a member of the MB caught wearing egyptain military clothes and faking being an egyptain army solider.

- - - Updated - - -

i have to reply to you on this video!! shame on you turk!!! this is a video from the city of arish in sinai, and these my dear are islamist militant groups firing rockets on people praying friday prayers!!

- - - Updated - - -

turk these videos you r posting prove there is a plan by these islamists to cause a crack between the people and the army. SHAME ON YOU for doing this and spreading shit like this. you r no different than them.
 

Attachments

Bisco

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2005
14,384
rumors spreading around that mohammed bardie will be sworn prime minister tonight. this step has loads of positive potential bec we need some one with vision for a better future for this country. he was one of the very first ones to call for the revolution whilst mubarak was still in power and when his security machine was in full swing.

as for the articles posted here regarding the military by non other than turk it is true bec this article is published on the 15th of feb 2012 at a time the minister was indeed a mubarak right hand man who was minister for 20 years and mind you the army it self had issues with him, yes they own there own business blah blah but what this article does'nt really mention is that the military also builds infra structures ( road and bridges) for us to use, and if you are ever in cairo you will know that usually these projects are the best projects made. the lands are under control by the army but what the article fails to understand is that the military doesnt get the cash in there pockets or a certain officer takes the money.


not to mention the current minister of defence was not one of the top ranking officers with mubarak :) liek i said this is an old article check date :) i'm in no way calling for this to remain, the people of egypt deserve to have full transparency when it comes to non security risk info when it comes to the military.

confirmed bardie is going to be prime minister :)
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
83,483
No, i want you to name them because it seems source is your arse as i have never heard those Islamists funded by government attacking people in Turkiye.
I have it that IZ's arse is a good authority. ;)

rumors spreading around that mohammed bardie will be sworn prime minister tonight. this step has loads of positive potential bec we need some one with vision for a better future for this country. he was one of the very first ones to call for the revolution whilst mubarak was still in power and when his security machine was in full swing.

as for the articles posted here regarding the military by non other than turk it is true bec this article is published on the 15th of feb 2012 at a time the minister was indeed a mubarak right hand man who was minister for 20 years and mind you the army it self had issues with him, yes they own there own business blah blah but what this article does'nt really mention is that the military also builds infra structures ( road and bridges) for us to use, and if you are ever in cairo you will know that usually these projects are the best projects made. the lands are under control by the army but what the article fails to understand is that the military doesnt get the cash in there pockets or a certain officer takes the money.


not to mention the current minister of defence was not one of the top ranking officers with mubarak :) liek i said this is an old article check date :) i'm in no way calling for this to remain, the people of egypt deserve to have full transparency when it comes to non security risk info when it comes to the military.

confirmed bardie is going to be prime minister :)
I heard that. Was wondering if you thought that was a good move or not. Good to see some quick action here. Hopefully he gets some support and some time in the chaos right now.

And yeah -- I can't lend any credibility to articles over a year old on Egypt, given how much things change so quickly.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 27)