But in reality this is the test, believing in the unseen because there is a lot of empirical evidence for the unseen, one of which is the meticulous balance in the universe.
Look at human beings, they are obviously completely different to all other living creatures in that they're concious and are constantly changing the world around us.
You think monkeys and other creatures are actually not conscious?
I'd advice you to investigate more about this point as I'm sure it would hit you by surprise.
Still, there is no relation whatsoever between my editing and your reply... I'm starting to sense a trend here of jumping from subject to subject in your discussion.
You ask this question within the boundaries of scientism. There's a reason belief is called belief and it's not because a mathematical formula can be provided for it.
You ask this question within the boundaries of scientism. There's a reason belief is called belief and it's not because a mathematical formula can be provided for it.
If by thinking outside of the box you mean believing in things with absolutely no proof or supporting evidence or a way to verify then yes, it is really hard, crazy may I say.
There's plenty of logical and rational proofs for the existence of God. For example the design of the earth. One has to traverse the need for such things as a mathematical formula to prove God's existence.
There's plenty of logical and rational proofs for the existence of God. For example the design of the earth. One has to traverse the need for such things as a mathematical formula to prove God's existence.
There's plenty of logical and rational proofs for the existence of God. For example the design of the earth. One has to traverse the need for such things as a mathematical formula to prove God's existence.