I'd have to agree with both of you. Much bigger number of the voters on goal.com, apart from being 15, are probably Juve fans than Viola fans.
But even though i agree that Batistuta was a better player, the difference wasn't big at all. Both share very similar record (Batistuta has 0.58 goals per match while playing for Italian teams, Trezeguet has 0.60 goals per match while playing for Juve), both spent a year in serie B and both rarely missed a goalscoring oportunity.
Batistuta's advantage was , imo, that he knew how to score out of nowhere while for Trez it always has to be a created chance in order to score. And Batigol was more technical than Trez.
But even though i agree that Batistuta was a better player, the difference wasn't big at all. Both share very similar record (Batistuta has 0.58 goals per match while playing for Italian teams, Trezeguet has 0.60 goals per match while playing for Juve), both spent a year in serie B and both rarely missed a goalscoring oportunity.
Batistuta's advantage was , imo, that he knew how to score out of nowhere while for Trez it always has to be a created chance in order to score. And Batigol was more technical than Trez.
