++ [ originally posted by [LAC] ] ++
depends on whether you choose to accept the fact that it is god or coincidence, or science, or nature
for example- the distance from the earth to the sun is perfect for supporting human life. if it were an closer or farther we wouldnt be alive. you can call that coincidence. or you can call it god.
similarly, the fact that the human race has all the attributes not only to survive, but to reproduce and improve their existence with their mental capacity can be attributed to either luck, or god.
depends on what you choose to follow.
depends on whether you choose to accept the fact that it is god or coincidence, or science, or nature
for example- the distance from the earth to the sun is perfect for supporting human life. if it were an closer or farther we wouldnt be alive. you can call that coincidence. or you can call it god.
similarly, the fact that the human race has all the attributes not only to survive, but to reproduce and improve their existence with their mental capacity can be attributed to either luck, or god.
depends on what you choose to follow.
Oh man, those are the arguments of someone that fails to see outside the box, or in this case doesnt want to admit that the universe doesnt revolve around mankind and Earth...
The universe is endless, right? There are billions and billions and billions of different stars out there, right? Now, almost all of those stars have a few planets revolvin around them, around 10 in average. Now that would be tens of billions and billions and billions of planets, right? Is it not possible that just a few of those planets would be exactly at the right distance from the stars and with the right conditions for the forming of life? It is isnt it? Well, Earth is just one of those planets, and I'm sure there are more. If life didnt exist here, it would most certanly exist somewhere else, like it probably does.
