I'm gonna try and find some stats for you, but I was mainly referring to the nature of the teams that won the competition over the past decade and how they favor a more attacking approach and score more goals.
Yes, I do realize correlation doesn't imply causation, and defensive minded teams in Chelsea and Inter
have won the competition with a more conservative approach. Nonetheless, deploying a more attacking approach is likely to yield better results.
Yes, I do realize correlation doesn't imply causation, and defensive minded teams in Chelsea and Inter


Teams that win the CL playing attacking football are the richest clubs in football. Building an attack-minded team that is capable of winning CL is far more expensive than building a defensive-minded team that can get to the final and hopefully nab one. Unfortunately, or revenue and spending pattern makes it far more likely for us to have European success with the defensive-minded approach.
Of course this also makes it very unlikely we'll ever be outright favourites in a CL final, and our style won't be as aesthetically pleasing, but it also means we will be a contender unlike similar revenue/selling to buy clubs that try to win playing attacking football against teams with better attackers and get smashed every time.
