[CL] Porto 2-1 Juventus [February 17th, 2021] (11 Viewers)

vote

  • 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 13

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 12

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 14

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 44

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 28

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 9

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 8

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
I had a look at the highlights again

What is absolutely clear is that this guy just fucking jogs around while Rabiot runs like a headless chicken. So many times where they are both either attached at the hip on top of each other or Rabiot is getting in advanced position and Benta is jogging around. Just far too casual. No positional awareness.
3e3fef63595c10f19b80f160318cfadc.jpg


First image look they are all on top of each other, that's more on Rabiot and Benta as Mckennie has that free role

76a5c190586868cf74d6a5fd2d4ef783.jpg


I know the mids can't get pushed to the wings but this is just an example of how our mids are all over the place, how are we expected to move the ball centrally or play it to the forwards to lay off when we have no spine.

0c93af673aa5a0f15fc5828a9c6c72e6.jpg


Benta was jogging before this and wouldve made it in front of the porto player if he acrually ran. Instead he is left behind


5b94de0db400f80ba22fc4daf3b5ef6c.jpg


This one Bentancur, once again being lazy, doesn't push up and occupy that space between the porto players. If he does that he creates space for others by occupying at least one of their center mids



Lazy lazy lazy and 0 positional awareness. Also he constantly has his back to goal. Rabiot has 0 awareness and positional skill, his only ability is to break at pace other than that nothing. The two of them offer no presence in the midfield and leave us with a midfield that is disconnected from the the defense and the attack.
I think those are the consequences of that hybrid formation which looks very schema-less and THAT confuses the players the most.

I think a lot of that is on Pirlo, he asks CMs to move between the lines which leaves the defense exposed as fuck. I think it'd massively help if he played a classic 433, players would know their roles better and how to behave and when. You're responsible for some ground and you operate in there. If the tactics change due to trained/wanted schemas, then it's predictable - the players know what is going on, what changes and why. These are the basics. Pirlo instead, gives them a lot of freedom to move around and that leaves the midfield shapeless.

I mean, why not play this vs Porto?

Chiesa - CR7 - Kulu
Rabiot - Bentancur - McKennie
AS - De Ligt - Demiral - Danilo
Szczęsny
This is a very basic setup but you can alternate this in many ways: Chiesa and Kulu can play inwards like above or you swap them on the wings and then they go down the line. You can ask Rabiot/McKennie to join Ronaldo in the middle (only one at a time pls) to create some numeric advantage in the box. If Bentancur is too shaky as the game goes on, you can put him as B2B and move Rabiot to DM. There are countless options here, just ask Allegri...

I still struggle with Pirlo's way of thinking because he seems to be oriented towards 442 but his holding mids too often are caught too high up the pitch, so what are they holding then? Bentancur understood very well the DM position under Sarri and now suddenly he can't do it? IMO it's just a clear lack of preparation and clarity of the game. You can ask Kroos or Modric to improvise and they will do it well but not our mids, most of them are solid soldiers who are supposed to do simple things in a simple way.

BTW. I really think that Pirlo didn't prepare the team for Porto's high pressing (he didn't expect it most likely, rookie mistake again?). It looks like there was no assumption that they could do it and the players were shocked when it turned out it's not going according to the plan from the very first minute. Weak heads quickly dropped and from there it was a huge struggle.
 

Boksic

Senior Member
May 11, 2005
13,369
I think those are the consequences of that hybrid formation which looks very schema-less and THAT confuses the players the most.

I think a lot of that is on Pirlo, he asks CMs to move between the lines which leaves the defense exposed as fuck. I think it'd massively help if he played a classic 433, players would know their roles better and how to behave and when. You're responsible for some ground and you operate in there. If the tactics change due to trained/wanted schemas, then it's predictable - the players know what is going on, what changes and why. These are the basics. Pirlo instead, gives them a lot of freedom to move around and that leaves the midfield shapeless.

I mean, why not play this vs Porto?

Chiesa - CR7 - Kulu
Rabiot - Bentancur - McKennie
AS - De Ligt - Demiral - Danilo
Szczęsny
This is a very basic setup but you can alternate this in many ways: Chiesa and Kulu can play inwards like above or you swap them on the wings and then they go down the line. You can ask Rabiot/McKennie to join Ronaldo in the middle (only one at a time pls) to create some numeric advantage in the box. If Bentancur is too shaky as the game goes on, you can put him as B2B and move Rabiot to DM. There are countless options here, just ask Allegri...

I still struggle with Pirlo's way of thinking because he seems to be oriented towards 442 but his holding mids too often are caught too high up the pitch, so what are they holding then? Bentancur understood very well the DM position under Sarri and now suddenly he can't do it? IMO it's just a clear lack of preparation and clarity of the game. You can ask Kroos or Modric to improvise and they will do it well but not our mids, most of them are solid soldiers who are supposed to do simple things in a simple way.

BTW. I really think that Pirlo didn't prepare the team for Porto's high pressing (he didn't expect it most likely, rookie mistake again?). It looks like there was no assumption that they could do it and the players were shocked when it turned out it's not going according to the plan from the very first minute. Weak heads quickly dropped and from there it was a huge struggle.
:agree:

A common theme this season is players standing in top of each other. In the Porto game alone there were 3 or 4 instances where our players ran into each other.

They don't seem to know their role and where they should be running. Which could be a reason why we aren't stretching teams and why there are gaps all over the place.
 

juventus4life

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2012
3,951
:agree:

A common theme this season is players standing in top of each other. In the Porto game alone there were 3 or 4 instances where our players ran into each other.

They don't seem to know their role and where they should be running. Which could be a reason why we aren't stretching teams and why there are gaps all over the place.
Is it on Pirlo or Tudor? I don't even know what the analyst is doing in our coaching staff.
 

PhRoZeN

Livin with Mediocre
Mar 29, 2006
15,841
BTW. I really think that Pirlo didn't prepare the team for Porto's high pressing (he didn't expect it most likely, rookie mistake again?). It looks like there was no assumption that they could do it and the players were shocked when it turned out it's not going according to the plan from the very first minute. Weak heads quickly dropped and from there it was a huge struggle.
Pirlo knew what Porto he was facing, though he underestimated their high press, otherwise he was spot on.

These were his words.

Pirlo pre match Porto:
"This will be a very difficult match," the coach said.
"They defend very well and have kept four or five clean sheets in the Champions League.
"They're a compact team, in the style of Atletico Madrid.
"They're very good at closing down spaces. So, we need to be patient and not force things because they're good at counter attacking.
"Porto are different to us and they play differently in their league and in the Champions League.
"They remind me a lot of the Atletico Madrid teams of Simeone."

And he summed it up post match:

Pirlo “We had prepared well for this game, it was not the attitude we wanted, but conceding a goal in the opening minute when we handed it to them on a silver platter made everything more difficult.”

I've watched Porto in a few of their bigger league games this season and Pirlo is right they do play the opposite in CL, but then who would blame them. The fact Pirlo knew Porto will sit back and he couldn't prepare plan A or B in terms of attack shows his lack of experience and yes to an extent lack of preparation.

Moreover it's the mental preparation he never thought about, you could put your money Conceicao did. Conceicao actually didn't give away the high pressing in his pre-match conference, instead spoke about balance, so in a way his team did everything right and we did everything wrong. To Pirlos anguish he has a squad with a number of lackadaisical players. Pirlo knows this of course but I feel he doesn't know how to manage it.

after our win against ferencvaros Pirlo said the following:

"I am someone who talks a lot with the players, then they go on the pitch and the choices are theirs.
"But it is important that these choices are right: we need to be less selfish and close games earlier."

If he talks a lot it means his trying behind the scenes, but the players are not heeding. Let's see how it goes, I haven't fully ran out of faith on Pirlo I just wish he stops inviting pressure and maybe with a bit of a stable lineup and lack of injuries his limited strengths might just do enough to help us progress.
 

sgjuveboy

Senior Member
Oct 31, 2012
2,723
This result is simply down to referee’s crappy performance.

These days, don’t bother trying to win an ECL game if you are not prepared to present your kids along with his non-white friends to spend a night with the referee, like Mr. Ramos before the night of every ECL final that his team plays.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
69,329
This result is simply down to referee’s crappy performance.

These days, don’t bother trying to win an ECL game if you are not prepared to present your kids along with his non-white friends to spend a night with the referee, like Mr. Ramos before the night of every ECL final that his team plays.

Michael Jackson is the referee?
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,819
What does playing 38 games have to do with it? Teams in EPL, Ligue 1 and La Liga have the same amount of league fixtures?
You didnt understand my post. It was about the mindset of our club who cant switch from a 38-game tournament where there's always another chance to fix things, to a CL format where literally every second matters.
 

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
62,568
Dude. The first Allegri season people consistently bitched about, after Cardiff... 17-18. We scored 86 goals in the league. Conceded 24. +62 goal differential. 95 points. Smashed Madrid 3-1 at the Bernabeu in that return leg after disaster mistakes from Buffon-Chiellini and Dybala red card screwed us in first leg. We weren’t winning matches 1-0 that year. We were consistently scoring 2+ goals. And dominating almost everyone we played that year.

Allegri’s very last year was a mess on every level. But before that, his Juventus was dominant as fuck. And was twice within 45 minutes of winning the CL, against teams with vastly more expensive squads at the time. It’s complete bullshit that Allegri couldn’t win CL. He managed to beat pretty much everyone in CL.

Given proper backing by management and building the team to suit his wants, instead of constantly selling his top players, then he would have won us a CL for sure. If we had just kept Vidal in 15-16 and 16-17 I’d say we’d have very likely won CL one of those years.
Stevie is a broken record with that shit.
 

pavluska

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
7,339
Ref blaming does nobody any favors.
Funny, during the game I was thinking sight for sore eyes, a good ref for a change (maybe could've given us one less yellow and them one more but nothing to complain about), then right at the end...

Would've been daylight robbery if Porto didn't get a W from this game, but technically, it's what it is, a PK.

Btw, are you Portuguese and have a fav Portuguese team?
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,819
Funny, during the game I was thinking sight for sore eyes, a good ref for a change (maybe could've given us one less yellow and them one more but nothing to complain about), then right at the end...

Would've been daylight robbery if Porto didn't get a W from this game, but technically, it's what it is, a PK.

Btw, are you Portuguese and have a fav Portuguese team?
How long have you been followig Juve? This is CL, every single 50-50 incident will end against Juve.
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
18,177
It wasnt a 50-50 IMO but it doesnt really matter as the scoreline is 2-1 which means we need to win without conceding or win by 2 goals.
I hope we learned our lesson and play better football
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
didn't check, but my best bets are still fullmatchesandshows.com and/or rojadirecta.org

bookmark these pls
:tup: Done.

- - - Updated - - -

i am really enjoying seeing the suffering in this thread.

just need juvejay to come implode and i will reach nirvana
:lol: @JuveJay is awesome though. He is not likely to implode.

- - - Updated - - -

I hope we learned our lesson and play better football
We haven't learned anything for 3 seasons already and counting...
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)