I don't think it's any lower once they've actually reached the first final.
Like flipping a coin. The chances of getting two tails in a row are 1 in 4, but when you've flipped it and got tails, the odds of the next one being tails are back to 1 in 2.
I don't think it's any lower once they've actually reached the first final.
Like flipping a coin. The chances of getting two tails in a row are 1 in 4, but when you've flipped it and got tails, the odds of the next one being tails are back to 1 in 2.
If it was last season's team I would have agreed with Andy arguing that other teams would be better prepared for Bayern, Bayern lacking element of surprise and mentally in a bit of doubt in ability to go all the way because they failed last time. But this Bayern is different and better than last season with 1 new top striker Madzukic, 1 new top midfielder J. Martinez and 1 new top defender Dante.
I don't think it's any lower once they've actually reached the first final.
Like flipping a coin. The chances of getting two tails in a row are 1 in 4, but when you've flipped it and got tails, the odds of the next one being tails are back to 1 in 2.
nothing to do with probability theory the way you are suggesting. It's all about how difficult it is to make the final in general. When it comes to repeating finals, it's usually harder (which is why, if you follow this trend over a long period of time, in a given year you are more likely to have two new finalists than the year before - less true in European football than say a cap-league like the NFL) but has to do with factors outside probability theory, as TTW suggested (e.g. the human/mental factor of lesser motivation, roster changes that may weaken/strengthen the team in question and/or its opponents, etc, etc).