Chiellini already gone ! (1 Viewer)

Togon

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2003
511
#41
We let fiorentina buy half of the ownership, cause, we dont want to pay his sallary during his fiorentina spell, and we needed the money we got hopefuly for Canna and Janku. I dont afraid fiorentina could grab him from us if he turns out to be class, since Juve is much bigger than Fiorentina, and class players usually choose the better team.

this season our defensive line should look like this


zebina-thuram-canna-zambro

or

zambro-thuram(zebina).canna-janku

on the bench: iuliano, montero, tudor, pesotto, birindelli, legro

none of this players can be sold for the money they worth, because last years performace. To have chiellini, Juve should sell one-or two of them. I think in Moggis plan, we buy Chiellini back next year for about 4-5 million euros, and sell birindelli and/or pesotto for some 2-4 million (that's 2-4 million more they worth nowadays.)
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

juventus2

Senior Member
Jul 6, 2004
749
#42
if Janku will come we will probalby play this defence

Zambrotta---Thuram---Cannavaro---Jankulovski

I know Zambrotta isn't a RB but that's only becaouse he never played there before, in my opimnio he would be perfect for there.He was a great RM and an even better LB. And what's the difference between LB and RB. I think he would fit right in that spot.And would soot him better then LB becaouse he's right footed. And besides I don't wan't see him at RM becaouse Olivera plays there
 

_Emerson

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,109
#44
Well if we absolutely need a new fullback, then Oddo is much better than Jnakulovski, plus we wouldnt need to take Zambrotta out of position, why change something who works wonderfull, Zambrotta most continue on the left side, he and Nedved works great together.
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,330
#45
jank, is a much better player than oddo, and will offe much more variety to cappello than oddo would.
 

Desmond

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2002
8,938
#47
no way oddo is better than jank,marek is more versatile,can cross,take set pieces,shoot and link up with neddy.

oddo is older,probably dribbles better but is a mediocre defender.
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,330
#48
i dont see oddo as a good dribbler at all, the only thing he would offer is consistancy and a good cross, kinda like a italian gary neville.
 
Aug 26, 2003
4,187
#50
I also think that Chiellini would not have got many time to play for us this season! this guy is only 20 years old, and we can still buy him back! and lets not forget he was playing in Serie B and for Juve you have to play also CL and for the title in Serie A, thats a hugh difference.

And if he only gets to play in Coppa Matches he doesn't profit of that!!
 

_Emerson

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,109
#51
++ [ originally posted by John #10 ] ++
i dont see oddo as a good dribbler at all, the only thing he would offer is consistancy and a good cross, kinda like a italian gary neville.
Haha, you arent serious!, Oddo is much better as a fullback than what Janku is, the thing who is good with Janku is that he is versatile, but he isnt the best in any of those positions he can play in.
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,330
#52
im deadly serious. Oddo is no way a superior full back. He doesnt offer pace, positioning, aerial ability, all he offers is good cross and consistan movement with the rest of the back line.
 

_Emerson

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,109
#53
Well isnt dribbling, superior ball control and good crosses what a fullback is suppose to do?
And Oddo does that better than Jankulovski.
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,330
#54
superior ball control??

Jank has the superior passing, superior attackingmovement, pace, and general defending skills.He also offers superior crosses to oddo, oddo jus has good crosses.
 

_Emerson

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,109
#55
Thats not the Jankulovski i know, but Oddo has quite superior ball control, i have seen few who have the skill to get the ball past obsticles (opponents) like Oddo does, he almost always gets through to shoot the cross. He is a warrior.
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,330
#56
whats oddo made his name for was his crossing ... that was it, he wasnt a prominant dribbler.

And how is that not the jank u kno of?
 

_Emerson

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,109
#57
I dont think Jankulovski is any better than Oddo on the skills i mentioned, thats why i said its not the Janku i know.
But i am perfectly aware of Jankulovski's superior versatility, but i dont see the use to have a player rotating around on the pitch, at least not in Juve, when you can get a one position specialist instead.
 

Desmond

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2002
8,938
#58
++ [ originally posted by John #10 ] ++
i dont see oddo as a good dribbler at all, the only thing he would offer is consistancy and a good cross, kinda like a italian gary neville.
well jankulovski isn't a very good dribbler either is he:angel:
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,330
#59
Des: neither are the zizous or henry's, but janks has the ability to make space for a passs, or one of his long balls.

_emo....ur opinion, i would find janks versatility, my opinionated views his abilitys, younger ages, and the fact he is a rare left footer, push him above oddo's positives.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)