Case study, feels like school 
I assume you know the answer or you wouldn't be asking?
I assume you know the answer or you wouldn't be asking?
Buy on AliExpress.com
Capital Punishment (21 Viewers)
- Thread starter Snoop
- Start date
invitation to consider
Buy on AliExpress.com
Case study, feels like school I assume you know the answer or you wouldn't be asking?
I assume these 50 people don't run a prison cause that would detract too much from their productive endeavors? In that case I don't know, problem is too far removed from any common scenario I'm familiar with.
Or they do have a prison, in which case they put him in there, probably for life, and now 48 people have to decide how to redistribute their responsibilities. Since the loss of productive labor is proportional to the loss in population, that should be possible.
Furthermore, I would like the state in this 50 person country to offer therapy to those afflicted. That may not heal them completely, but it might help them rebuild their lives.
I assume you know the answer or you wouldn't be asking?I assume these 50 people don't run a prison cause that would detract too much from their productive endeavors? In that case I don't know, problem is too far removed from any common scenario I'm familiar with.
Or they do have a prison, in which case they put him in there, probably for life, and now 48 people have to decide how to redistribute their responsibilities. Since the loss of productive labor is proportional to the loss in population, that should be possible.
Furthermore, I would like the state in this 50 person country to offer therapy to those afflicted. That may not heal them completely, but it might help them rebuild their lives.
Im talking about a murder that took place with no trace of neglect,self defense etc in it.These are different cases,and yes they should be tried and sentenced differently.That is why i said that it is imperative that the system of Justice should be flawless,so a criminal can be handled keeping everything in mind and not just the act itself.Removing the death sentece to accomodate the innocent is not the right way to go.
he obducted little girls, raped them and killed them
I believe 4 died and 2 were freed when they raided his place
for what he did, he should have been given the death penalty
there is absolutely no chance of rehabilitation here, he has never showed any remorse
you just want him in jail, ok but throw away the key
as long as he lives he will always be a danger
I believe 4 died and 2 were freed when they raided his place
for what he did, he should have been given the death penalty
there is absolutely no chance of rehabilitation here, he has never showed any remorse
you just want him in jail, ok but throw away the key
as long as he lives he will always be a danger
Case study, feels like school I assume you know the answer or you wouldn't be asking?
I assume these 50 people don't run a prison cause that would detract too much from their productive endeavors? In that case I don't know, problem is too far removed from any common scenario I'm familiar with.
Or they do have a prison, in which case they put him in there, probably for life, and now 48 people have to decide how to redistribute their responsibilities. Since the loss of productive labor is proportional to the loss in population, that should be possible.
Furthermore, I would like the state in this 50 person country to offer therapy to those afflicted. That may not heal them completely, but it might help them rebuild their lives.
I assume you know the answer or you wouldn't be asking?I assume these 50 people don't run a prison cause that would detract too much from their productive endeavors? In that case I don't know, problem is too far removed from any common scenario I'm familiar with.
Or they do have a prison, in which case they put him in there, probably for life, and now 48 people have to decide how to redistribute their responsibilities. Since the loss of productive labor is proportional to the loss in population, that should be possible.
Furthermore, I would like the state in this 50 person country to offer therapy to those afflicted. That may not heal them completely, but it might help them rebuild their lives.
The action is the same. You think you can be superior to a barbarian if you have a good reason for murder? Think again.
You said killing without a reason is barbaric. That's not even true. A barbarian would never kill without a motive, considering the risk involved. A barbarian would kill for resources (what we call wars), or jealousy (what we call murder) or revenge (what you call justice).
You said killing without a reason is barbaric. That's not even true. A barbarian would never kill without a motive, considering the risk involved. A barbarian would kill for resources (what we call wars), or jealousy (what we call murder) or revenge (what you call justice).
Ah, so heinous crimes would be given the death penalty.
Because sentences are handed down by either a panel, jury or judge a justice system can never be flawless. Human error, emotions, experience, as well as cultural and ethnic biases are all factors that could give the wrong sentence to the wrong fellow. Even with a strong appellate court system, bad cases slip through the cracks. A simple case study of Texas executions over the last fifteen years will reflect that.(Just trust me)
That said no Justice system will ever be flawless no matter how complete or good it is. Therefore there is no chance that an alleged criminal will always be treated the same. And as every murder case is different there can be no precedents to set standards. The sentence of death has been and will always be an imperfect science and people who probably shouldn't get the death penalty from time to time be sentenced to just that. So since there can never be a flawless justice system you cannot always be 100% sure when sentencing a person to death.
Another note: Why not accommodate the innocent? After all they are who the Justice system in any country is there to protect.
Because sentences are handed down by either a panel, jury or judge a justice system can never be flawless. Human error, emotions, experience, as well as cultural and ethnic biases are all factors that could give the wrong sentence to the wrong fellow. Even with a strong appellate court system, bad cases slip through the cracks. A simple case study of Texas executions over the last fifteen years will reflect that.(Just trust me)
That said no Justice system will ever be flawless no matter how complete or good it is. Therefore there is no chance that an alleged criminal will always be treated the same. And as every murder case is different there can be no precedents to set standards. The sentence of death has been and will always be an imperfect science and people who probably shouldn't get the death penalty from time to time be sentenced to just that. So since there can never be a flawless justice system you cannot always be 100% sure when sentencing a person to death.
Another note: Why not accommodate the innocent? After all they are who the Justice system in any country is there to protect.