Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (23 Viewers)
- Thread starter gsol
- Start date
This part of AA's speech earlier tonight is such a good summary of how unbelievably fishy this whole thing is:
"In May 2010 we presented a statement to the FIGC requesting an investigation of the criteria under which the 2005-06 Scudetto was awarded to Inter. For 14 months it remained a dead letter. This raises doubts about the workings of the sports justice system, because the 2006 maxi-trial was completed in four months and led to severe punishment. Whereas we had to wait 14 months to get a reply to an eight-page statement. Quite a difference. At that point it inevitably became a political question, but up to then we had always been confident in the proper workings of the sports justice institutions. Palazzi's report came out on July 1st, a few days after expiry of the time limit for contesting the documents in question. We asked the Federal Council for a ruling, and when the Council decided not to make a decision we considered other ways of pursuing the interests of our club.”
"In May 2010 we presented a statement to the FIGC requesting an investigation of the criteria under which the 2005-06 Scudetto was awarded to Inter. For 14 months it remained a dead letter. This raises doubts about the workings of the sports justice system, because the 2006 maxi-trial was completed in four months and led to severe punishment. Whereas we had to wait 14 months to get a reply to an eight-page statement. Quite a difference. At that point it inevitably became a political question, but up to then we had always been confident in the proper workings of the sports justice institutions. Palazzi's report came out on July 1st, a few days after expiry of the time limit for contesting the documents in question. We asked the Federal Council for a ruling, and when the Council decided not to make a decision we considered other ways of pursuing the interests of our club.”
All along I thought that was boxing hand wrap.
The way it works in Italy is, you can kill someone, hide in your nonna's basement for five years, and then come out and say they can't do shit because of the statute of limitations.
Retard.
That's what I'm expecting. Him to have a pistol down there and pick them fat pigs off one by one.
Some thought about it and now a radio station said Juve could announce that another league would gladly take Juve and have them leave Serie A. 
The way it works in Italy is, you can kill someone, hide in your nonna's basement for five years, and then come out and say they can't do shit because of the statute of limitations.
What a scumbag.
"The serenity of italian football is at stake, so Juventus should shut up, whether they were wrong'ed or not. Serenity above all!"
"The serenity of italian football is at stake, so Juventus should shut up, whether they were wrong'ed or not. Serenity above all!"
That's what I'm expecting. Him to have a pistol down there and pick them fat pigs off one by one.
The majority of the posts in this thread are completely rooted in concern of, and interest in, the power struggles and corruption perpertrated by 'rich dudes' which led to the 2006 calciopoli scandal, which affected juventus horribly and hugely.
I am surely one of many who appreciate greatly anyone who makes a very complicated situation easier for a juventino with no legal background, to understand and keep abreast of what is happening and what is likely to happen...
Many thanks, mr Jem, for your efforts in this thread. I appreciate the information and explanations. Keep 'em coming.
I am surely one of many who appreciate greatly anyone who makes a very complicated situation easier for a juventino with no legal background, to understand and keep abreast of what is happening and what is likely to happen...
Many thanks, mr Jem, for your efforts in this thread. I appreciate the information and explanations. Keep 'em coming.
It was just my elaboration of, or take, if you will, on what Petrucci said earlier: "Those who want to re-open (the case) create problems for the serenity of Italian football."
Such an infuriating statement from that piece of shit.
http://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/news?slug=afp-fbl_ita_juventus_coni_calciopoli_20111116
Such an infuriating statement from that piece of shit.
http://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/news?slug=afp-fbl_ita_juventus_coni_calciopoli_20111116
Well, as much as i know, you go step by step from lower to higher courts because there is no turning back. Now, i suck at law, but i know this for sure so ill just explain it to you like this; if you choose to go from a lvl 2 to a lvl 3 court then there is a chance that if you dont like the decision of the lvl 3 court you go to the highest lvl 4 court (for example) and maybe you will get something out of it. But, if you go from the lvl 2 court straight to the highest lvl 4 court then the decision of the lvl 4 court will be final and you wont be able to go back to the lower lvl 3 court.....
Well, here is Moratti saying he agrees with the meeting but under one condition: Scudetto 2006 must not be under consideration.
http://www.goal.com/it/news/240/cal...etrucci-e-agnelli?utm_source=tf&utm_medium=tw
http://www.goal.com/it/news/240/cal...etrucci-e-agnelli?utm_source=tf&utm_medium=tw
He has more to lose than anyone else involved. That much is clear to me.
As for Andrea Agnelli, I say give him credit flow juventini, for he has been good to his word, and seems unwilling to simply mak a show of an effort for justice. If he is as hellbent as he seems, on taking this as high as possible, even better. Also...and I may be awfully wrong on this score...people have written before about John Elkanns inlvolvement in the original scandal. Are those suggestions not now dead on the vine? Given the fact that Elkann, is essentially, Andrea's boss, and Elkann would surely not be allong this brilliant crusade to continue if he could be in any way personally implicated in any legal proceedings? Does this clear Elkann also?
As for Andrea Agnelli, I say give him credit flow juventini, for he has been good to his word, and seems unwilling to simply mak a show of an effort for justice. If he is as hellbent as he seems, on taking this as high as possible, even better. Also...and I may be awfully wrong on this score...people have written before about John Elkanns inlvolvement in the original scandal. Are those suggestions not now dead on the vine? Given the fact that Elkann, is essentially, Andrea's boss, and Elkann would surely not be allong this brilliant crusade to continue if he could be in any way personally implicated in any legal proceedings? Does this clear Elkann also?
