Moratti threatens of leaving his club if they take off the scudetto of "honesty". 
Buy on AliExpress.com
Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (50 Viewers)
- Thread starter gsol
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
if anybody here thinks we are going to get anything other than option 3 then they are dreaming. lets be honest,this has been drawn out as long as possible and completely ignored by the media save for the few occasions they are able to produce a sensationalist anti-Moggi headline.
if we are to truly get justice,it will not be in an Italian court
if we are to truly get justice,it will not be in an Italian court
Tuesday 28 June, 2011
Agnelli questions Inter Scudetti
Juventus President Andrea Agnelli launched a Calciopoli sideswipe at Inter. “We won 29 Scudetti, Milan 18, we don’t know about Inter...”
The Bianconeri have handed in a formal request for the FIGC to re-evaluate the 2005-06 Scudetto, which was stripped from Juve and handed to the Nerazzurri during the Calciopoli scandal.
They insist new evidence shows Inter were not completely innocent parties in the scandal, so did not deserve to be given that title.
“Should we divide up the pay-per-view television rights by keeping meritocracy in mind? I’d support it, but that means taking the history of a club into consideration,” said Agnelli.
“We won 29 Scudetti, Milan 18, we don’t know about Inter... There must be a reason why these three clubs represent 70 per cent of the football fans in Italy.”
The history books show Juventus have 27 titles, as the 2004-05 and 2005-06 editions were stripped. 2004-05 went unassigned.
The Serie A sides are still debating how to spread the wealth from pay-per-view television rights between the various clubs, including a complex combination of how many fans they have, average ratings and more.
Agnelli questions Inter Scudetti
Juventus President Andrea Agnelli launched a Calciopoli sideswipe at Inter. “We won 29 Scudetti, Milan 18, we don’t know about Inter...”
The Bianconeri have handed in a formal request for the FIGC to re-evaluate the 2005-06 Scudetto, which was stripped from Juve and handed to the Nerazzurri during the Calciopoli scandal.
They insist new evidence shows Inter were not completely innocent parties in the scandal, so did not deserve to be given that title.
“Should we divide up the pay-per-view television rights by keeping meritocracy in mind? I’d support it, but that means taking the history of a club into consideration,” said Agnelli.
“We won 29 Scudetti, Milan 18, we don’t know about Inter... There must be a reason why these three clubs represent 70 per cent of the football fans in Italy.”
The history books show Juventus have 27 titles, as the 2004-05 and 2005-06 editions were stripped. 2004-05 went unassigned.
The Serie A sides are still debating how to spread the wealth from pay-per-view television rights between the various clubs, including a complex combination of how many fans they have, average ratings and more.
Cant the defense argue that there was fraud upon court?
Fraud upon the court
In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.
Officers of the court include: Lawyers, Judges, Referees, and those appointed; Guardian Ad Litem, Parenting Time Expeditors, Mediators, Rule 114 Neutrals, Evaluators, Administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.
"Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication". Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted."
wiki
Fraud upon the court
In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.
Officers of the court include: Lawyers, Judges, Referees, and those appointed; Guardian Ad Litem, Parenting Time Expeditors, Mediators, Rule 114 Neutrals, Evaluators, Administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.
"Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication". Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23
In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted."
wiki
