Board & Management (37 Viewers)
- Thread starter .zero
- Start date
In Dutch law a new director is liable/responsible for old errors. I think in Italy it is the same. So a new director can be found guilty for something the old director did. The rate is that you have to solve problems, otherwise you can just pick a new director and go on like nothing happened with the next one.
So in the end theres no distortion in the sporting competition that had to be corrected with a point penalty. Just wrongful actions of the members of the board. This is completely opposite to the original reasoning for the -15 penalty, but this was to be expected, they know they cant convincingly link plusvalenza to sporting advantage.
pathetic
It is 2006 all over again. It’s put down to sporting fairness/fraud, the kind of terminology you may use for feigning injury or wasting time.
A clearance of the board and key personnel, no public interviews or clarity on the process making it look on the surface as if they are guilty of crimes we are never informed of.
Ultimately the players and the fans are the ones punished, so we can’t blame players for not wanting to stick around and pay for the consequences of the tools upstairs and we likely lose another chunk of the already disillusioned fanbase.
Those still here are clinging to the hope of a reset and that we will recover as we did eventually 5 years on from the previous fiasco. Yet another shitstorm for us to endure for following a spineless ownership.
A clearance of the board and key personnel, no public interviews or clarity on the process making it look on the surface as if they are guilty of crimes we are never informed of.
Ultimately the players and the fans are the ones punished, so we can’t blame players for not wanting to stick around and pay for the consequences of the tools upstairs and we likely lose another chunk of the already disillusioned fanbase.
Those still here are clinging to the hope of a reset and that we will recover as we did eventually 5 years on from the previous fiasco. Yet another shitstorm for us to endure for following a spineless ownership.
the irony is that nothing illegal has been done, there is no objective price list for footballers, the club had audited financial reports, the contracts with other clubs were legit, so there's nothing to fix
also the objective responsibilities usually apply when the new managers are actually able to fix the irregularities made by their predecessors. in that case, arrivabene couldn't fix anything as the contracts were legit (every federation accepted those contracts) and the reports were audited
it's still the biggest joke of any sports trial that i've ever seen, pure political witch hunt straight from the '50s communist block
also the objective responsibilities usually apply when the new managers are actually able to fix the irregularities made by their predecessors. in that case, arrivabene couldn't fix anything as the contracts were legit (every federation accepted those contracts) and the reports were audited
it's still the biggest joke of any sports trial that i've ever seen, pure political witch hunt straight from the '50s communist block
And UEFA now excludes us from EL/Conference. Next season we start afresh, finally the uncertainty won't be an excuse anymore. It's true it will cost a lot but at least you can start from scratch, otherwise the agony would continue and there's always a risk of bleeding out when it's extended to 2-3 years. The prosecution could afford it, the club simply couldn't.
Now let's hope the club finds a common ground with Allegri and they save up something when releasing him. Giuntoli + a new coach and we might actually retain all of our stars and go back to being competitive as soon us the new season starts.
Now let's hope the club finds a common ground with Allegri and they save up something when releasing him. Giuntoli + a new coach and we might actually retain all of our stars and go back to being competitive as soon us the new season starts.
