Board & Management (47 Viewers)
- Thread starter .zero
- Start date
Yeah, that wasnt the case. Juventus is plc and financial reports are audited and approved every year and then made public. We first need to respect laws and standards of accounting practice, not their moral codes. In this instance (plusvalenza deals) we have done deals by the book. They (Figc) cant regulate this without meddling with international standards and then they would be the ones risking procedures infront of civil courts.
That's how witch hunting looks like in a banana republic. Naples journalists and fans think we should be relegated because we bought titles by signing Ronaldo.
The conviction doesn't seem to be about any deal because no one can stick 'stiff' numbers on players' foreheads. The prices get decided on a free market and it takes two to agree on that. Yet no one else is penalized. How come?
They used wiretaps where the management were discussing the necessity of making capital gains to make the ends meet. Classic stuff in football, especially during covid times. Throw a stone if one haven't done that, at least in Italy.
The conviction doesn't seem to be about any deal because no one can stick 'stiff' numbers on players' foreheads. The prices get decided on a free market and it takes two to agree on that. Yet no one else is penalized. How come?
They used wiretaps where the management were discussing the necessity of making capital gains to make the ends meet. Classic stuff in football, especially during covid times. Throw a stone if one haven't done that, at least in Italy.
Read the following this considered as manipulation of invoice by the kangaroo court judiciary:
the invoice for the purchase of Aké: address (wrong) and player details (wrong) have been changed in pen. NOT the price! CAF argues that it was a way to avoid the exchange with Tongya, not the purchase. But exchanges are LEGAL.
the invoice for the purchase of Aké: address (wrong) and player details (wrong) have been changed in pen. NOT the price! CAF argues that it was a way to avoid the exchange with Tongya, not the purchase. But exchanges are LEGAL.
No court of law uses wire taps as actual evidence as it can be easily manipulated or edited. Same was said in 2006
- - - Updated - - -
Funny thing is the actual invoice was done correctly and electronically. Figc wouldn't know that because they choose not to know. Scumbags
- - - Updated - - -
Read the following this considered as manipulation of invoice by the kangaroo court judiciary:
the invoice for the purchase of Aké: address (wrong) and player details (wrong) have been changed in pen. NOT the price! CAF argues that it was a way to avoid the exchange with Tongya, not the purchase. But exchanges are LEGAL.
the invoice for the purchase of Aké: address (wrong) and player details (wrong) have been changed in pen. NOT the price! CAF argues that it was a way to avoid the exchange with Tongya, not the purchase. But exchanges are LEGAL.
It is banana republic you need to remember most wiretapping happens in Italy.
https://www.euractiv.com/section/po...m-wiretapping-practices-amid-safety-concerns/
https://www.euractiv.com/section/po...m-wiretapping-practices-amid-safety-concerns/
plusvalenza itself isn't unsustainable, unless the sale comes with an expensive purchase too. in other words, big money swaps/purchases are unsustainable for a club like juve. straight sales were instrumental for the sustainability before tici started to practice his stupid swaps. before 2018/19 (ronaldo year, the start of tici's reign of financial terror), we made the del fabro - romagna swap with cagliari, and that's all. marotta wasn't without blame (too expensive signings include higuain, costa and berna), still, the plusvalenza wasn't a tool for survival and pushing expenses into the future.
listing plusvalenza alone won't show the full picture. check amortization too for the same periods. the change is incredible, and ronaldo was only part of the issue. cancelo, bonucciback, arthur, de ligt, kulu, danilo, romero, pellegrini, morata, demiral, rovella, mckennie were all +20m signings, and i'm sure i'm missing a few. also the overly inflated wage bill started with ronaldo, after that, everybody thought that he deserved 5m+ just to train alongside the goat.
also, the plusvalenza policy started with marotta. he sold 1 or 2 players with minimal minusvalenza before 2018. after that, the chaos started, and we became completely unpredictable on the market. romero is my favorite example: bought for >30m, amortized for a few years, never played a single match, sold for a massive minusvalenza by tici around 18m, just to be bought by the same tici for ~50m the next season. what the actual fuck.
listing plusvalenza alone won't show the full picture. check amortization too for the same periods. the change is incredible, and ronaldo was only part of the issue. cancelo, bonucciback, arthur, de ligt, kulu, danilo, romero, pellegrini, morata, demiral, rovella, mckennie were all +20m signings, and i'm sure i'm missing a few. also the overly inflated wage bill started with ronaldo, after that, everybody thought that he deserved 5m+ just to train alongside the goat.
also, the plusvalenza policy started with marotta. he sold 1 or 2 players with minimal minusvalenza before 2018. after that, the chaos started, and we became completely unpredictable on the market. romero is my favorite example: bought for >30m, amortized for a few years, never played a single match, sold for a massive minusvalenza by tici around 18m, just to be bought by the same tici for ~50m the next season. what the actual fuck.