Board & Management (32 Viewers)
- Thread starter .zero
- Start date
nah, i can't. and it's i can't, not i'm not willing to.
i'll ask an other simple question instead: can you spot the federal prosecutor's name here, on the literal first page of the document that you allegedly read?
((((((((((
- - - Updated - - -
thanks for this, sometimes i need to be told to stop caring
i'll ask an other simple question instead: can you spot the federal prosecutor's name here, on the literal first page of the document that you allegedly read?
((((((((((- - - Updated - - -
thanks for this, sometimes i need to be told to stop caring
Last edited:
nah, i can't. and it's i can't, not i'm not willing to.
i'll ask an other simple question instead: can you spot the federal prosecutor's name here, on the literal first page of the document that you allegedly read?
((((((((((
- - - Updated - - -
thanks for this, sometimes i need to be told to stop caring
i'll ask an other simple question instead: can you spot the federal prosecutor's name here, on the literal first page of the document that you allegedly read?
((((((((((- - - Updated - - -
thanks for this, sometimes i need to be told to stop caring
meanwhile, the so called Italian journo, but in reality a naples trash is in denial mode:
Regarding the colossal nonsense of the 500,000 terminations at #DAZN, the news is that the 'churn rate' is only known to the company, which only discloses it when it is obliged to do so: drawing up financial statements, reporting to the market if listed, etc. So it's bullshit
Regarding the colossal nonsense of the 500,000 terminations at #DAZN, the news is that the 'churn rate' is only known to the company, which only discloses it when it is obliged to do so: drawing up financial statements, reporting to the market if listed, etc. So it's bullshit
Its published in a newspaper today
The Juve lawyers are hard at work to overturn the verdict and are focusing on three concepts: illogicality, lack of motivation and lack of foundation. CONI will not judge if the sentence was fair or not only if the procedure followed was correct but has the power to annul the sentence or send the case for a new trial. (@CalcioFinanza)
the way I see it:
1. Juve and other Italian and foreign clubs focused on plusvalenza mostly for FFP purposes + perhaps to avoid financial scrutiny (bankruptcy, enhanced reporting, shareholder trouble, etc). In the end some of it was unnecessary due to COVID relief on FFP, but I think that was most likely the intent - to comply with FFP in the least painful way possible which can be viewed as fraudulent intent as it's basically an attempt to fool UEFA (or anyone else who might be interested in the financial statements);
2. FFP is 100% the jurisdiction of UEFA, but since inflated valuations are incredibly difficult to be prove without subjective evidence like the wiretaps (Chine tried it with just the TM values and failed miserably) and Italian LEA most probably can't share gigabytes of files from their investigation with UEFA and UEFA most probably also don't have the resources to listen to hundreds of hours of wiretaps in Italian, in a true Italian fashion FIGC decided to start this crusade and to witch hunt Juventus. perhaps Ceferin played a role in FIGC trying to finish killing Italian football, but tbh don't give a fuck;
3. in the court document released they don't talk about the motive and the advantage gained by this practice at all and focus 100% on the practice itself, I believe this is because of the 1st and 2nd point. if they did it'd clearly look like they're annihilating an Italian club on UEFA orders + the -15 wouldn't make any sense.
1. Juve and other Italian and foreign clubs focused on plusvalenza mostly for FFP purposes + perhaps to avoid financial scrutiny (bankruptcy, enhanced reporting, shareholder trouble, etc). In the end some of it was unnecessary due to COVID relief on FFP, but I think that was most likely the intent - to comply with FFP in the least painful way possible which can be viewed as fraudulent intent as it's basically an attempt to fool UEFA (or anyone else who might be interested in the financial statements);
2. FFP is 100% the jurisdiction of UEFA, but since inflated valuations are incredibly difficult to be prove without subjective evidence like the wiretaps (Chine tried it with just the TM values and failed miserably) and Italian LEA most probably can't share gigabytes of files from their investigation with UEFA and UEFA most probably also don't have the resources to listen to hundreds of hours of wiretaps in Italian, in a true Italian fashion FIGC decided to start this crusade and to witch hunt Juventus. perhaps Ceferin played a role in FIGC trying to finish killing Italian football, but tbh don't give a fuck;
3. in the court document released they don't talk about the motive and the advantage gained by this practice at all and focus 100% on the practice itself, I believe this is because of the 1st and 2nd point. if they did it'd clearly look like they're annihilating an Italian club on UEFA orders + the -15 wouldn't make any sense.
Last edited: