doesn’t this happen quite frequently in legal cases that the detailed justification is released at a later date?
Maybe,, but for any verdict.. you won't see this amount of confusion
- why only Juve
- what are the rules violated exactly
Some say the intentional inflation of asset values allowing undeserved advantage.
Some say.. no, it is the magnitude of it.
Some say it is "disloyalty"
- and no fucking one can explain why -15.. not -3.. not -9 and not -30.. why not fines?
- if it was Judge B, not A.. would the decision be different? Looks yes....
Finally.. in any legal case.. the guilt is declared before the sentence and the sentence itself is not something up to the judge.. yes there is a range and different judges could rule different sentences.. but it is one of the punishments already known... a fine.. 1 year in prison.. will be 10 if the crime was the 3rd etc..