Blasi snubs Juve return....LOL !!!! (11 Viewers)

- vOnAm -

Senior Member
Jul 22, 2004
3,779
#42
Dominic said:
We didn't pay anything for Bojinov. Fiorentina gave us around 8 million euro's and Bojinov on loan with an option to buy half of him, for Mutu. Though some time ago already, Fiorentina set the price of 6 million euro's to buy Bojinov 100%.

Something like that.
That was my initial understanding.

Hmm, whether or not we already own him now or not either way its clear that we can make his move permanant by giving 6mil euros.


ahmed said:
sounds like a win-win situation for us...we are getting a player with the same potential as Mutu and one who is committed to the Juve cause
Well it was prettymuch a win win situation, Fiorentina were desperate to find somebody to partner and support Toni. Mutu suited this role far more better than Bojinov.

On our side we got a youngster who was very highly rated in his teens. At one stage I think he was playing better football than rooney. A player that is far in age to DP and Trez, so ti reduce first team rotational problems.
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
#44
- vOnAm - said:
Hmm, whether or not we already own him now or not either way its clear that we can make his move permanant by giving 6mil euros.
6 million € is nothing, Juve should cash that amount right away.

If we could sign Boumsong for 5 mil. €, we can sign Bojinov too, I cannot believe this sum of money is too excessive for Juventus.:disagree:
 

- vOnAm -

Senior Member
Jul 22, 2004
3,779
#45
mark83 said:
6 million € is nothing, Juve should cash that amount right away.

If we could sign Boumsong for 5 mil. €, we can sign Bojinov too, I cannot believe this sum of money is too excessive for Juventus.:disagree:
Its not too excessive for Bojinov...but we don't need to rush his transfer. The clause has alraedy been agreed and whether we bbuy him now or the end of the season has no positive relevance.

We have more time to evaluate, and save our much needed cash flow.
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
#46
- vOnAm - said:
Its not too excessive for Bojinov...but we don't need to rush his transfer. The clause has alraedy been agreed and whether we bbuy him now or the end of the season has no positive relevance.

We have more time to evaluate, and save our much needed cash flow.
Yeah, but it is obvious that this kid is great, and Fiorentina can easily change their mind about him and want him back.

What then? Then we would regret we didn´t buy him sooner, so I say: What are we waiting for?
 

Jun-hide

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2002
2,068
#47
mark83 said:
Yeah, but it is obvious that this kid is great, and Fiorentina can easily change their mind about him and want him back.

What then? Then we would regret we didn´t buy him sooner, so I say: What are we waiting for?
Mark I think the clause is embedded in the contract so we shouldnt worry too much about Fiorentina changing down their mind. What is written on it, stays there.:cool: .

I am pretty certain that we will exercise our option on Bojinov. 6m euro for such talented young player is nothing. But we have surplus of strikers here and it would be better if we do not have to spend extra cash. I am not too sure Fiorentina will take it, but Miccoli, Mutu, Toni could be devastating trio in Serie A. Worth a try. All of course, is based on the presumption Benfica doesnt exercise their option - which I dont think they will. They just wanted Micco to play for them for free, option to just smoothe things out.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,901
#49
Blasi is one of the most useless players we have had in the past decade. I remember watching him against Liverpool almost two years ago where he couldn't even complete a pass in the first half.
 
Jan 7, 2004
29,704
#51
Andy said:
Blasi is one of the most useless players we have had in the past decade. I remember watching him against Liverpool almost two years ago where he couldn't even complete a pass in the first half.

how relieved i was when he got a yellow against real 2 years ago.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
#52
ahmedz said:
sounds like a win-win situation for us...we are getting a player with the same potential as Mutu and one who is committed to the Juve cause
this is not a win win situation, if we dont pay nothing for Bojinov,
Fiorentina can keep him and Mutu for nothing and we will keep the 8mil,
if you consider 8mil for Mutu a good deal then...its a win:disagree:
we are forced to buy Bojinov now...
on the other hand if we manage to pull the 6 mil that would mean Bojinov+2mil = Mutu thats a good deal but i really doubt it, i think its going to be 4+Blasi(2-4mil)
if we involve Miccolli at any case we loose any way...
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
#58
I take it the deal with Bojinov is a co-ownership one and therefore is it just for one year that juve have the option to buy him or could they leave it to next season?
 

Mr. Gol

Senior Member
Sep 15, 2004
3,472
#59
juve red said:
I take it the deal with Bojinov is a co-ownership one and therefore is it just for one year that juve have the option to buy him or could they leave it to next season?
It's a loan deal with an option to buy for 4 million.
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,377
#60
What a shame blasi doesnt want to come back...paro and marchiso havent replaced him have they.......
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)