People here talking about Matuidi like we are signing Padoin FFS!!! Have anyone read Veratti's interview, the guy is full of prize for Matuidi, and people here see him as a literally cripple who is about to retire...
Buy on AliExpress.com
Blaise Matuidi - DM - PSG (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
Buy on AliExpress.com
Haha that was funny as hell.
- - - Updated - - -
If Matuidi comes, he'll be saying the same shit some time after. Or did Vidal wanted to leave "more" than Matuidi? Lol.
- - - Updated - - -
We signed so many of course I was going to forget one 
To be fair, it seems obvious now that he wanted out and asked to leave. Just look at his recent comments.
To be fair, it seems obvious now that he wanted out and asked to leave. Just look at his recent comments.
wasnt meant to be funny, but hell thats right. They both want out and I guess its how much the selling club values the player at. PSG will be the happier one, probably not in the short term because matuidi is/was going to be a legend for them but price wise they got themselves a good deal and I wouldnt be suprised if Raiola himself played a part. Ironically he played a part in us fucking ourselves twice this season...
http://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2016/blaise-matuidi-set-to-meet-with-psg-to-ask-for-move/
http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...-Nemanja-Matic-Blaise-Matuidi-Juventus-switch
Of course PSG will come out with it to give assurance to their fans but you cant rule out he didnt ask to leave.
http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...-Nemanja-Matic-Blaise-Matuidi-Juventus-switch
Of course PSG will come out with it to give assurance to their fans but you cant rule out he didnt ask to leave.
Yes but thats irrelevant, the fact that vidal deep down had some erotic fantasy to play at bayern whilst he was at leverkusen and before he came to Juve shouldnt matter. Its what he asked for when he was at Juve. There is absolutely nothing to suggest bayern were not interested in Vidal before he asked to leave. In most cases its the agents who are contacted first. These are subtleties and certainly shouldnt dictate what a selling club asks for. Bottom line both wanted out.
It's exactly the same situation.
Every club, before making a move to the other club, gets in touch with a player's agent to see if the guy is interested.
Bayern made a "sondaggio" to Vidal, he was interested.
Juve made a "sondaggio" to Matuidi, he was interested.
Marotta asked Vidal if he indeed wanted to leave to Bayern and if he would accept their contract offer, he said yes.
PSG did or do the same with Matuidi.
Then teams will proceed to negotiate the fee. If it's not good enough, you just dont do it. Point blank. Thats for both clubs.
If every player who gets a decent offer grabs the club by the balls, we are fucked. It's not how it works. Contracts exist not only for the interest of the player. It's a mutual parties bond.
I just think this is a poor decision, and as I said before, it's not only about Matuidi quality, but about his characteristics.
We've got rid of important assets (i.e., young players with resale value) in a very short space of time (Vidal, Coman, Pogba, Morata, even Pereyra and Zaza) and now we are clearly unbalanced in terms of age.
Even Lemina has already said that his priority is "to play", and that's not happening a lot now, probably. We need WC experienced players and to develop youth at the same time, and that is a big questionmark now.
Marotta will need to sell one or two of these too many 28-32 yrs players we have the next years and replace with WC youngsters, if we want to keep financials in a healthy state.
Every club, before making a move to the other club, gets in touch with a player's agent to see if the guy is interested.
Bayern made a "sondaggio" to Vidal, he was interested.
Juve made a "sondaggio" to Matuidi, he was interested.
Marotta asked Vidal if he indeed wanted to leave to Bayern and if he would accept their contract offer, he said yes.
PSG did or do the same with Matuidi.
Then teams will proceed to negotiate the fee. If it's not good enough, you just dont do it. Point blank. Thats for both clubs.
If every player who gets a decent offer grabs the club by the balls, we are fucked. It's not how it works. Contracts exist not only for the interest of the player. It's a mutual parties bond.
I just think this is a poor decision, and as I said before, it's not only about Matuidi quality, but about his characteristics.
We've got rid of important assets (i.e., young players with resale value) in a very short space of time (Vidal, Coman, Pogba, Morata, even Pereyra and Zaza) and now we are clearly unbalanced in terms of age.
Even Lemina has already said that his priority is "to play", and that's not happening a lot now, probably. We need WC experienced players and to develop youth at the same time, and that is a big questionmark now.
Marotta will need to sell one or two of these too many 28-32 yrs players we have the next years and replace with WC youngsters, if we want to keep financials in a healthy state.
almost but no, unlike other clubs we have a policy that is not to keep a player or convince a player to stay against their wish.
There are numerous examples of clubs and transfer out there where a club has gone and convinced the player to stay. You could argue this is because they have offered a new contract or by other means. Whether its healthy to convince or force a player to stay is another matter.
Squad is too old? What about Rugani, Bonucci, Benatia, Sandro, Lemina, Pjanic, Pjaca, Sturaro, Dybala... Even Matuidi (if he comes), Marchisio, Asamoah, Khedira, Higuain, Mandzukic, Cuadrado (if he comes) arent that old and they got at least 3 years on top level. We can slowly adjust the age in that period of time.
- Status