Arturo Vidal (117 Viewers)

B3N

Floro Fckin' Flores
May 16, 2010
6,624
Sheik is right in saying if we played a higher line defence and more pressure game, the way Lazio did for the majority of first half and start of 2nd half, Ledesma wouldn't have had the time to pick that pass:However; judging by the way we've played in most part of this season, Conte's been asking for zonal defending (due to Chiello's absence and players fatigue and one of the reason that it may seem we play with less intensity this year), you can't really fault Vidal for covering the space around our box and marking Mauri who happened to be there, therefore it was mostly the fault of Peluso (not being close to bonbon) and Giacch for not staying with gonzalez.
 

Linebreak

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2009
16,022
We didn't need "players" to close down Ledesma. We just needed one(at least on that goal). Preferably one closest to him, i.e. Vidal.

Also, when we got 5 players in the defensive line, then it doesn't make sense to blame Giaccherini for tracking Gonzales when it was the job of one of the defenders, namely Peluso here, to do so. And judging as Giacch was in the midfield at the time of that move, it's totally uncharacteristic of him to chase a player who is running towards the center of defence. Not to mention it's useless doing that because Giacc was in no position to make any difference against such a high cross. I fail to see how Giacc could've influenced the outcome in any way. Maybe if this was a pass along the ground, maybe. But a well-placed aerial pass that even Peluso could do nothing against? There is no legitimate reason to blame Giachherini for this.

And all the while you're doing this, you fail to acknowledge the very simple task of a midfielder like Vidal: closing down another midfielder. Vidal could've very easily influenced the play by preventing the cross and averting the danger. Yet you want to ignore this and blame Giaccherini. Ridiculous!

- - - Updated - - -



The Vidal gods can kiss my ass!
Anyway. Go watch cricket bro.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
We didn't need "players" to close down Ledesma. We just needed one(at least on that goal). Preferably one closest to him, i.e. Vidal.
If Juve had an extra body or two in midfield, they could have had one player with Mauri and another with Ledesma, instead of leaving Vidal to try and do two things.

Also, when we got 5 players in the defensive line, then it doesn't make sense to blame Giaccherini for tracking Gonzales when it was the job of one of the defenders, namely Peluso here, to do so. And judging as Giacch was in the midfield at the time of that move, it's totally uncharacteristic of him to chase a player who is running towards the center of defence. Not to mention it's useless doing that because Giacc was in no position to make any difference against such a high cross. I fail to see how Giacc could've influenced the outcome in any way. Maybe if this was a pass along the ground, maybe. But a well-placed aerial pass that even Peluso could do nothing against? There is no legitimate reason to blame Giachherini for this.
Regardless of the system, you have to track your opposite number unless you and a teammate communicate and agree that someone else will cover the run.

Giaccherini just wandered off without making any initial move to track, so I don't think Peluso told him he had Gonzalez.

And all the while you're doing this, you fail to acknowledge the very simple task of a midfielder like Vidal: closing down another midfielder. Vidal could've very easily influenced the play by preventing the cross and averting the danger. Yet you want to ignore this and blame Giaccherini. Ridiculous!
A midfielder has many tasks, including closing players down in dangerous areas.

Ledesma wasn't in a dangerous are, though.
 
Apr 15, 2006
56,640
Sheik is right in saying if we played a higher line defence and more pressure game, the way Lazio did for the majority of first half and start of 2nd half, Ledesma wouldn't have had the time to pick that pass:However; judging by the way we've played in most part of this season, Conte's been asking for zonal defending (due to Chiello's absence and players fatigue and one of the reason that it may seem we play with less intensity this year), you can't really fault Vidal for covering the space around our box and marking Mauri who happened to be there, therefore it was mostly the fault of Peluso (not being close to bonbon) and Giacch for not staying with gonzalez.
And I've shown why Giacc cannot be at fault for not tracking Gonzalez. There were already 5 players in our defence line, and Giacc, along with Padoin and Vidal formed the midfield line covering the penalty area. Even if he did track him, there is NOTHING Giacc could've done. He certainly couldn't have pressured Gonzalez into making a mistake or clearing the ball. First, cos he's really short, and second, that cross was inch perfect. There is NOTHING he could've done to prevent the goal.

Anyway. Go watch cricket bro.
Go pray to god, bro.

If Juve had an extra body or two in midfield, they could have had one player with Mauri and another with Ledesma, instead of leaving Vidal to try and do two things.
In midfield, it was 3(Vidal, Giacc, Padoin) against 2(Gonzalez and the guy who passed to him). Ledesma was RIGHT IN FRONT of of Vidal. He gave Ledesma all the time in the world to put in a perfect cross.

Regardless of the system, you have to track your opposite number unless you and a teammate communicate and agree that someone else will cover the run.

Giaccherini just wandered off without making any initial move to track, so I don't think Peluso told him he had Gonzalez.
Giach didn't "wander off". He held the midfield line along with Vidal and Padoin in front of the penalty area. Even if he tracked Gonzales, I fail to see what he could've done to prevent the goal. That cross was inch perfect. Neither could Giacc put Gonzales off nor could he head the cross away. What is he supposed to do that is so crucial to defending the cross that you blame him more than Vidal?

A midfielder has many tasks, including closing players down in dangerous areas.

Ledesma wasn't in a dangerous are, though.
Oh really? Well the not so dangerous Ledesma assisted the goal. Which is why in hindsight, Vidal is responsible. His negligence cost us the opening goal.
 

MikeM

Footballing Hipster celebrating 4th place with Tuz
Sep 21, 2008
12,834
Vidal ran at Ledesma under control because Ledesma is attempting to cross a ball with no angle from midfield and we have half our team in the box. The history of soccer as well as Vidal's brain tells him that this is not a dangerous situation. The only way to block that cross was to sprint and jump with his leg.

If Ledesma saw Vidal running at him at 100% his brain would then tell him that Vidal is out of control and will either jump at the cross or be unable to change direction because he is a human, not a feline. Then Ledesma would perform a fake and go around Vidal.

From there, Ledesma would be able to have a direct shot at our goal from the edge of the box, in the center of the field. That is extremely bad.

In hindsight, I'm sure Vidal would run at Ledesma and kick him straight in the face.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,757
Vidal ran at Ledesma under control because Ledesma is attempting to cross a ball with no angle from midfield and we have half our team in the box. The history of soccer as well as Vidal's brain tells him that this is not a dangerous situation. The only way to block that cross was to sprint and jump with his leg.

If Ledesma saw Vidal running at him at 100% his brain would then tell him that Vidal is out of control and will either jump at the cross or be unable to change direction because he is a human, not a feline. Then Ledesma would perform a fake and go around Vidal.

From there, Ledesma would be able to have a direct shot at our goal from the edge of the box, in the center of the field. That is extremely bad.

In hindsight, I'm sure Vidal would run at Ledesma and kick him straight in the face.
:lol:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 102)