Antonio Conte (221 Viewers)

How would you rate Conte's (dis)appointment?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5


Results are only viewable after voting.

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
This, seriously


Money dab United
- Pogdab
- zlatan
- rooney
- martial
- Rashford
- mhki
- Depay
- Mata

City
well i dont need to list all their expensive players, and also Guardiola made it work allready

Arseanal
- Sanchez
- Ramsey
- Ozil
- wallcottt
- Giroud
- Chechhch
- welbeck


Chelsea
- Courtois, fuck it
- Ivanovic
- matic
- Fabregas
- oscar
- hazard
- diego costa
-Willian

but pool ?

Some decent players, nothing outstandig. Yet look at how they are doing.
Firmino, Coutinho, Sturridge?
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,526
Agreed, those guys are nothing special. Countinho maybe but that's a big maybe. He's far from elite, but a very good player nonetheless.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,489
Selling them short. They are very good players, Mane too. Coutinho has been performing like a top AM for a while so hardly just decent.


It's the rest of the team that's primarily bit light weight, tho he has a decent mix of talent and physical qualities.

Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
How come people are saying Chelsea has an inferior selection of players? Their main starting 11 is just as good as City's and United's. City and United also have new managers, so to be honest Conte has no excuses. IMO anything less than a challenge for the title would be a failure on his part.

Liverpool and Spurs have an inferior squad to Arsenal, and a much more inferior squad than the first 3, IMO if either of Spurs and Pool get into the top four, they would be overachieving.

- - - Updated - - -

Id say all 3 are better than some of the guys you mentioned up there like Oscar, Welbeck, Walcott, Mata, Depay, Rashford, Rooney
They're better than some of the names in there of course. But you should be comparing starting players with starting players.

The front four of the 5 teams:

Arsenal: Sanchez, Ozil, Walcott and Giroud
Utd: Martial, Mata, Rooney and Zlatan
Chelsea: Hazard, Willian, Oscar and D. Costa
City: Sterling, De Bruyne, Silva and Aguero
Liverpool: Coutinho, Firmino, Mane and Sturridge

Would you not say that Pool's attacking four are a level below the other four?


IMO it's the fact that Klopp is doing a great job with them at the moment that is making them perform better than the other four teams, as individuals they are inferior to the others for the most part.
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,608
How come people are saying Chelsea has an inferior selection of players? Their main starting 11 is just as good as City's and United's. City and United also have new managers, so to be honest Conte has no excuses. IMO anything less than a challenge for the title would be a failure on his part.

Liverpool and Spurs have an inferior squad to Arsenal, and a much more inferior squad than the first 3, IMO if either of Spurs and Pool get into the top four, they would be overachieving.

- - - Updated - - -



They're better than some of the names in there of course. But you should be comparing starting players with starting players.

The front four of the 5 teams:

Arsenal: Sanchez, Ozil, Walcott and Giroud
Utd: Martial, Mata, Rooney and Zlatan
Chelsea: Hazard, Willian, Oscar and D. Costa
City: Sterling, De Bruyne, Silva and Aguero
Liverpool: Coutinho, Firmino, Mane and Sturridge

Would you not say that Pool's attacking four are a level below the other four?


IMO it's the fact that Klopp is doing a great job with them at the moment that is making them perform better than the other four teams, as individuals they are inferior to the others for the most part.
Their back 4 are substantially worse than what city, & utd have.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Selling them short. They are very good players, Mane too. Coutinho has been performing like a top AM for a while so hardly just decent.


It's the rest of the team that's primarily bit light weight, tho he has a decent mix of talent and physical qualities.

Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
You cant be seriously suggesting pool has a better selection then City, United, Chelsea or Arsenal
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,489
No I did not, reading comprehension please. I said the mentionned best Liverpool players aren't just decent as it was being painted as.

Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,526
No I did not, reading comprehension please. I said the mentionned best Liverpool players aren't just decent as it was being painted as.

Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
They're still not elite level tho. You won't see other teams bidding too much for them.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 207)