How come people are saying Chelsea has an inferior selection of players? Their main starting 11 is just as good as City's and United's. City and United also have new managers, so to be honest Conte has no excuses. IMO anything less than a challenge for the title would be a failure on his part.
Liverpool and Spurs have an inferior squad to Arsenal, and a much more inferior squad than the first 3, IMO if either of Spurs and Pool get into the top four, they would be overachieving.
- - - Updated - - -
Id say all 3 are better than some of the guys you mentioned up there like Oscar, Welbeck, Walcott, Mata, Depay, Rashford, Rooney
They're better than some of the names in there of course. But you should be comparing starting players with starting players.
The front four of the 5 teams:
Arsenal: Sanchez, Ozil, Walcott and Giroud
Utd: Martial, Mata, Rooney and Zlatan
Chelsea: Hazard, Willian, Oscar and D. Costa
City: Sterling, De Bruyne, Silva and Aguero
Liverpool: Coutinho, Firmino, Mane and Sturridge
Would you not say that Pool's attacking four are a level below the other four?
IMO it's the fact that Klopp is doing a great job with them at the moment that is making them perform better than the other four teams, as individuals they are inferior to the others for the most part.