Antonio Conte (102 Viewers)

How would you rate Conte's (dis)appointment?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5


Results are only viewable after voting.

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,087
2nd half is exactly why 3-5-2 sucks. We're completely dominating a team and they are down to their knees but all we have attacking is bunch of defenders and central midfielders trying to create something while our 2 strikers are isolated up front in front of a bus.
 

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
2nd half is exactly why 3-5-2 sucks. We're completely dominating a team and they are down to their knees but all we have attacking is bunch of defenders and central midfielders trying to create something while our 2 strikers are isolated up front in front of a bus.
And the you realize it'd be good to have players that can beat their man and cross/shoot or get a FK.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
2nd half is exactly why 3-5-2 sucks. We're completely dominating a team and they are down to their knees but all we have attacking is bunch of defenders and central midfielders trying to create something while our 2 strikers are isolated up front in front of a bus.
Its very sad that we just got 90 points in 34 games with this approach. 352 Obviously failed.

Look at Napoli and their wingers and mangificent team of stars. They are the real deal. Much more points then us.
 

Mister

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2014
5,742
2nd half is exactly why 3-5-2 sucks. We're completely dominating a team and they are down to their knees but all we have attacking is bunch of defenders and central midfielders trying to create something while our 2 strikers are isolated up front in front of a bus.
so if the 3-5-2 is changed into 4-3-3 we would magically have wingers in attacking positions ? . you do realize that the formation is based on the best 11 of our squad ? how do you make a 4-3-3 without a winger and a lb ? so the tactical change of 3-5-2 is to have a numerical advantage pls try and understand we are not chlesea that mourinho has the pleasure to kick out a player like mata just coz he dint fit into his beloved 4-2-3-1.
 

Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,692
so if the 3-5-2 is changed into 4-3-3 we would magically have wingers in attacking positions ? . you do realize that the formation is based on the best 11 of our squad ? how do you make a 4-3-3 without a winger and a lb ? so the tactical change of 3-5-2 is to have a numerical advantage pls try and understand we are not chlesea that mourinho has the pleasure to kick out a player like mata just coz he dint fit into his beloved 4-2-3-1.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Not surprised you missed the point again.
The point is that against a parked bus, there is no ideal approach. He calls that our 352 way of dealing with it sucks. Yet it has gotten an astonishing 90 points like this.

Juventus has no problem finding goals all year, but its this organisation "of defenders and central midfielders" that made sure we hardly conceded.



Napoli, play a fancy offensive style. Yet also lose cause alot more prone to the attack of the opponent.




Therefore, our style might be boring to some, but its extremely effective, and it absolutely doesnt suck
 

Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,692
Look, I'm gonna keep this simple. No one is asking to play a "fancy offensive formation". It's useless changing to a 4-3-3 NOW, because we lack the proper players. We need players who could create something next Summer. Our team is a machine, but if there's one thing we lack, it's creativity which even showed us in Europe because the quality is better than Serie A. No one is asking to play a Bayern like formation.

- - - Updated - - -

Instead of your garbage response, try to read what he says.

Basically, he says that we dont have the players to field the winger formations the infants demand.
And that is pretty correct
I think it's you who don't read what we say. No is asking for a fancy offensive formation, dolt.

- - - Updated - - -

I'll be back, anuses.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 91)