Antonio Conte (141 Viewers)

How would you rate Conte's (dis)appointment?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5


Results are only viewable after voting.

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
If Pirlo is rested Conte could actually use 343.

Llorente actually would be more useful in this kind of formation and Giovinco too (as a sub). I don't think it would make much of a difference for Tevez and Vucinic. It actuall could be easier for them with another player higher up the pitch.

We need a plan 'B', especially for teams like Real. 352 is too passive in that kind of matches.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,489
This plan B wouldnt be for Real, there is no way we would weaken our midfield and play one extra attacker vs them. If anything I wouldnt be suprised to see the 3-5-1-1 back vs them.
 

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
May 23, 2011
24,018
Did we use it against Catania that time? My memory is a bit foggy but I thought we played 4-3-3
You're right we started with 433 and later on changed to 442.

If Pirlo is rested Conte could actually use 343.

Llorente actually would be more useful in this kind of formation and Giovinco too (as a sub). I don't think it would make much of a difference for Tevez and Vucinic. It actuall could be easier for them with another player higher up the pitch.

We need a plan 'B', especially for teams like Real. 352 is too passive in that kind of matches.
:tup: 343 would be the way to go imo. We would have double block on both flanks and strong partnership Vidal-Pogba to hold the midfield.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,839
The thing with 3-4-3 is the same problem as 4-3-3,no proper RW.Vucinic and Tevez wont play there ,so quit this fantasy.

Options include Giovinco but he's not that direct and i question his ability to track back.I suppose you could include Isla as another option and i would say the most feasible option for that position but does Conte really seem convinced of playing him there ? Doesnt seem like it.
 

rakib567

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2013
10,087
The thing with 3-4-3 is the same problem as 4-3-3,no proper RW.Vucinic and Tevez wont play there ,so quit this fantasy.

Options include Giovinco but he's not that direct and i question his ability to track back.I suppose you could include Isla as another option and i would say the most feasible option for that position but does Conte really seem convinced of playing him there ? Doesnt seem like it.
right wingers usually are left footed. asamoah (who is now a left-mid player) can play in that role easily and he can track back as he is used to do in 3-5-2. giovinco quags and pepe could play there too.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,839
I like the 3-4-3,atleast it wont get as exposed on the wings as it would with the 3-5-2,but with the wealth of midfield talent we've got,i really doubt we would be moving away from the 3 man midfield anytime soon.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
The thing with 3-4-3 is the same problem as 4-3-3,no proper RW.Vucinic and Tevez wont play there ,so quit this fantasy.

Options include Giovinco but he's not that direct and i question his ability to track back.I suppose you could include Isla as another option and i would say the most feasible option for that position but does Conte really seem convinced of playing him there ? Doesnt seem like it.
I think Tevez could play RW.
right wingers usually are left footed. asamoah (who is now a left-mid player) can play in that role easily and he can track back as he is used to do in 3-5-2. giovinco quags and pepe could play there too.
:lol:
 

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
May 23, 2011
24,018
right wingers usually are left footed. asamoah (who is now a left-mid player) can play in that role easily and he can track back as he is used to do in 3-5-2. giovinco quags and pepe could play there too.
Playing Asmoah in the final 3rd is such a waste. He's not suited to play as LWB let alone RW. If we're to continue with 352 I would prefer Peluso tbh as LWB.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,839
I agree but that doesn't mean he can't play there or its not worth trying.
Well he can,but i'd rather him(our best attacker) be a direct goal threat by playing him in the center unlike on the right ,where he'd have to be either hugging the touchline or cut in and use his weaker left foot more often.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
We need @Zacheryah here to settle this. :D
There is surprisingly little diffrence between the mentionned 4-3-3 and 3-4-3.

RW ? Not asamoah offcourse, he doesnt have the skills to play there. He should be used as Cm (4-3-3) or defensive winger DW (3-4-3)

Tevez could play there, as an inside forward with alot of working.

buffon
lichtsteiner-barzagli-bonucci-chiellini
vidal-pogba-asamoah
tevez-llorente-vucinic

or

buffon
barzagli-bonucci-chiellini
lichtsteiner-pogba-vidal-asamoah
tevez-llorente-vucinic


I'd be in favor of the 3 man backline, since our defence is accustomed to it
 

VUCIMata10

Junior Member
Apr 5, 2013
479
In the confeds vs spain pirlo played in the 3-4-2-1 and was not nearly as effective, de rossi had a ton more touches then him, but pirlo did have a influence. But 3-4-3 im really skeptical about honestly, much rather have 433, but the 343 would be better for our defence as theyre acostomed to it, i would just like to see giovinco in the "1" in a 3-4-1-2 just for the hell of it
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 19, Guests: 107)