Teams like Athletico/Udinese/Porto do not spend a shit load of money.
I'm completely against spending like Chelsea/PSG/Madrid
I would prefer if we bought young players. Players that are showing great progress at a young age.
I should of been more clear.
Athletico and udinese arent really top teams. They are seller teams. They have 2-3 good years and 5 or more lesser ones. Like dortmund really.
Athletico has gotten quite lucky with their strikers, but when that luck runs out, their cycle is over and its gonna be taking quite a few years before they resurface. Like dortmund basically.
Porto is the only you mention, who actually is domminating its own league. However, its a story like anderlecht in belgium. They allways are top 3, partially cause without the star players, the team is still solid enough to get third. porto, like athletico, gambles on players, and sells em when they break trough.
What is my point here ? A true topteam, that wants to continue getting top3 in its domestic league, and consistantly perform in europe, doesnt make these gambles. They eighter are rich as fuck, or they slowly take their steps up there.
Because we slowly take steps, we didnt had to sell pogba when we underperformed in europe and made 25mil less turnover then expected.
If we would be taking gambles, we probably would have be forced to sell.