Angel Di Maria - AM RL/SS - Benfica (8 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,628
#43
abola NEVER said Benfica accepted the deal. They just said Benitez would want him and the offer was Tiaga+30m.


BS!!!
 

#10

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2002
7,377
#48
Horse crap. If this deal was true, it would show how mad Secco is, 30m on an in consistant winger who is not a great scorer of goals.

When we have a reinforced defence, then we can afford to throw money at wingers.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
#49
Horse crap. If this deal was true, it would show how mad Secco is, 30m on an in consistant winger who is not a great scorer of goals.

When we have a reinforced defence, then we can afford to throw money at wingers.
Plus we have a consistent Giovinco that costs nothing at all.

I love you.:oops:
 

Paolo Sosa

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2005
2,377
#52
if we signed him, i will go to italy myself just to shake the hand of Secco.

on the other hand, if we didn't fix our defence i will go to italy and will bitch slap secco and drag him to the ultras to kick his ass
 
May 21, 2008
434
#53
you must shoot him in both cases , to make sure he wont do anything stupid in the future like selling di maria :D???, deigo , buffon , marchisio or chellini ...
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,941
#55
We don't need this guy, especially not at that price when we have giovinco.

Signing him would just be another example of how wasteful our board is.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,499
#56
Signing him would be fantastic as heck, if we dont overpay. Far from wasteful to sign a bonafide quality winger, who CAN play RW, why do people assume everyone competes with Giovinco.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,941
#57
Because everytime we sign an attacking player Giovinco's spot in the pecking order goes down further.

A 4-2-3-1 with Gio - Diego - Di Maria as attacking mids would be sexy as fuck though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 7)