Andrea Pirlo (96 Viewers)

vote

  • Legend

  • History


Results are only viewable after voting.

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,620
Damn, what a way to point out that certain player is superior. :lol2: I guess Dybala is imbecile compared to Messi, amirite @Hist?
yes

- - - Updated - - -

:agree:

Marchisio is uninspiring, boring, unspectacular. We need to get Matic.
@Quetzalcoatl
Havent thought of that guy. I think Matic wins the boring award

- - - Updated - - -

Pogba is an imbecile compared to Vidal.
When it comes to the defensive side of the game namely reading the opposition's next move and being in the right place at the right time to intercept it then yes but going forward, Pogba has a lot better vision in picking out passes and moving in the right spaces with and without the ball
 

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
37,254
The Toure brothers suck mad dick 24/7 brah
Not kolo bro.


@Fr3sh Zambrotta is a fucking cerebral catastrophe.

Deal with it.
I agree Zambrotta is cancer. Worst thing to have ever happened. Hope he get 94 different types of cancer at the same time

- - - Updated - - -

Also you hateful niggas need Jesus in yo life. Tell Beppe to get him for us.
 
Jul 10, 2006
6,753
My god what an assist. I don't think there ever was a player so elegant on the ball like him. Pure genius. I really miss him.

I really hope Conte takes him to he Euros just to watch Pirlo one more time.

- - - Updated - - -



I am sorry but marchisio is an imbecile in comparison. That man is pure entertainment.
Yea, that was an incredible assist, how he got free from the defender and I'm still at a loss as to how he picked out Rossi behind everyone else then had the coolness to loft that pass right to the perfect place. he could literally not have done anything better.
 

pavluska

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
7,339
I am sorry but marchisio is an imbecile in comparison. That man is pure entertainment.
In comparison yes. Is there a more boring top level regista to watch than marchisio? Don't get me wrong I love his reliability and wouldn't sell him no matter what but in terms of entertainment the guy is very boring to watch. With Modric, Alonso, Xavi, Scholes, Gerrard, verratti you at least occasionally saw a moment of brilliance here and there every few games. The only top level regista/DM that keeps it always simple like marchisio that I can think of is besquets who is also very unspectacular but ofcourse with a very punchable face.




BTW, Modric, Xavi, Scholes, peak Gerrard aren't registi. Verratti can play in that role, but he's even better in the Modric/Xavi role, which is what he plays for PSG and Italy.

And Marchisio in the pivot role is a complete player who's decent or better at everything. He's one of the very best in the world in that position. Complaining about Marchisio makes no sense.

There aren't many Pirlo type players in the history of the game (in terms of both style and technique combined) let alone now. Closest to him nowadays is Verratti if he's played as a regista. No one else comes close. Again, makes no sense.

Hist, why don't you sit the next couple of plays out, champ?
:D

Marchisio is pretty boring if you know nothing about football
:tup: Very true.

compared to Pirlo? Is there a regista/DM that can come close to the brilliance and entertainment value of Pirlo?
So, after all the public outcry it's not Marchisio's fault anymore. :D

IF you are trolling, kudos.
He isn't. He labeled Marchisio a poor regista before our winning run started. After our winning run started, he pretended he never said that. Argued that he was talking about the backup options all along. Lambasted Lemina (even though he was injured) and Hernanes and Marotta because to him he failed to get solid backups for regista and SS roles, and argued that he was never wrong before, that Marotta did fuck up.

He does prefer players who're aesthetically pleasing and think they're automatically better footballers. This is a case of him being defensive about what he said before and also genuinely believing that Marchisio isn't good enough (but he doesn't think he's poor anymore) and stylistically not the right player as our regista and for our midfield and the team as a whole.

I'm anticipating a long essay. :D ;)
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,620


Tyrion_slaps_Joffrey.gif


BTW, Modric, Xavi, Scholes, peak Gerrard aren't registi. Verratti can play in that role, but he's even better in the Modric/Xavi role, which is what he plays for PSG and Italy.

And Marchisio in the pivot role is a complete player who's decent or better at everything. He's one of the very best in the world in that position. Complaining about Marchisio makes no sense.

There aren't many Pirlo type players in the history of the game (in terms of both style and technique combined) let alone now. Closest to him nowadays is Verratti if he's played as a regista. No one else comes close. Again, makes no sense.



:D



:tup: Very true.



So, after all the public outcry it's not Marchisio's fault anymore. :D



He isn't. He labeled Marchisio a poor regista before our winning run started. After our winning run started, he pretended he never said that. Argued that he was talking about the backup options all along. Lambasted Lemina (even though he was injured) and Hernanes and Marotta because to him he failed to get solid backups for regista and SS roles, and argued that he was never wrong before, that Marotta did fuck up.

He does prefer players who're aesthetically pleasing and think they're automatically better footballers. This is a case of him being defensive about what he said before and also genuinely believing that Marchisio isn't good enough (but he doesn't think he's poor anymore) and stylistically not the right player as our regista and for our midfield and the team as a whole.

I'm anticipating a long essay. :D ;)
and an essay you will get :D

This is absolutely false and I challenge you to prove it.

I have always said Marchisio is a good regista from last season. I defended Pirlo against the accusation that he is a liability, which he definitely wasn't as evidenced by how far we went last year with him as our primary Regista, and his stats, even in a formation that gave him defensive duties. All summer long I said we have not bought a vice-marchisio when there are no guarantees that Marchisio will replicate last season's form (given his up and downs historically) and will not be injured (which he was and we suffered for it terribly).

I also never said marchisio is dumb. I said he is dumb in comparison to Pirlo who is a genius. Marchisio's movement without the ball, how he makes himself available for others and his passing are all very good and very reliable, all of which require of intelligence. He just lacks the offensive intelligence that other top players in the same position have, like Modric, Alonso, Xavi etc.. and is thus less entertaining. I have no problems admitting that he is smarter defensively than this entire group of players.

The whole alarm I was raising about a lack of a vice marchisio shows how much I value his contribution. I even argued that he was one of the most important players in the squad because of how key his role is in the functioning of the midfield. I wouldn't say that Marotta fucked up for not getting a vice-marchisio if I didnt assume marchisio was important. It wouldnt be a fuck up if it was not buying a vice Asamoah or Padoin would it? It is a fuck up if there is no vice-an important player not an unimportant one.

About Lemina, I never said he was poor and again I challenge you to prove it. I said we have seen too little game-time of him to make a reasonable judgment and I said he strikes me more as a B2B player than a Regista. I said this very late in the season when Lemina scored a great goal and not at the start when we were struggling. I am now convinced he has potential but I am still not yet convinced he should be our vice-regista but rather a sub for khedira or Pogba. So again I never "lambasted" Lemina.

About this season, I still think Marotta should have bought a proper regista to fill in for marchisio. This was confirmed by how much we suffered at the start when our midfield was useless and Pogba had to drop deep to spray passes. I credit this season to Allegri more than Marotta in that regard because Marotta's risk back fired when marchisio was injured and when he returned allegri had to pull rabbits out of his hat and went on a crazy run. Having said that, Marotta overall did a good job since almost all his signings worked out well and in dybala's case it worked out brilliantly.

At the start of the season I criticized Marotta's decision not to buy a vice marchisio AND his choice for going for just dybala (you missed that part). I argued that it is too much to ask of Dybala to immediately fill in the shoes of all-time-best-form-Tevez and that he'd take a couple of years to reach that level. I did not expect Dybala to be that good and that mature and I was wrong. I normally admit that I am wrong when I make a wrong predictions so dont throw words in my mouth and try to paint me as a guy who retrospectively changes what he said to appear always right. If you want that kind of guy, then you should go for the ones that changed the definition of choking 4-5 times across the season to continue to blast Higuain and never admit they were wrong. I was wrong about dybala not being up to the task on his first season. I was wrong about Salah being better for Juve than Cuadrado @Post Ironic effectively changed my mind about that and I told him he was right as soon as he showed me the defensive stats of both. I was wrong in thinking that we will finish second after the poor start.
I was not wrong in saying Higuain is better than Morata (those on the other side never owned up to this). I was not wrong in saying that he has improved mentally and is no longer the same old choker (they never owned up to this either). I was not wrong in saying marchisio is not entertaining like other players and obviously especially pirlo (others including you freaked out over the term imbecile).
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 76)