BTW, Modric, Xavi, Scholes, peak Gerrard aren't registi. Verratti can play in that role, but he's even better in the Modric/Xavi role, which is what he plays for PSG and Italy.
And Marchisio in the pivot role is a complete player who's decent or better at everything. He's one of the very best in the world in that position. Complaining about Marchisio makes no sense.
There aren't many Pirlo type players in the history of the game (in terms of both style and technique combined) let alone now. Closest to him nowadays is Verratti if he's played as a regista. No one else comes close. Again, makes no sense.

Very true.
So, after all the public outcry it's not Marchisio's fault anymore.
He isn't. He labeled Marchisio a poor regista before our winning run started. After our winning run started, he pretended he never said that. Argued that he was talking about the backup options all along. Lambasted Lemina (even though he was injured) and Hernanes and Marotta because to him he failed to get solid backups for regista and SS roles, and argued that he was never wrong before, that Marotta did fuck up.
He does prefer players who're aesthetically pleasing and think they're automatically better footballers. This is a case of him being defensive about what he said before and also genuinely believing that Marchisio isn't good enough (but he doesn't think he's poor anymore) and stylistically not the right player as our regista and for our midfield and the team as a whole.
I'm anticipating a long essay.