Душан;1913894 said:
Selling some player automaticly makes it a failure?
somebody has to accept he made a mistake
Why?
Right after we secured Serie A promotion, our board has announced a five year plan of building up a new powerful team, destined to be the successor of the old Juve. Such a team cannot be built in a day/season and they asked from the Juve fans/friends to be patience, but confident because we have a 5 year plan.
I do not expect us to win any titles in this particular period and i wont blame anyone for that, unlike the majority of our over-optimistic. nearly delusional fans, who dream of titles!
But i do expect us, to set the bases of a strong team, i do expect us to build a competitive team by the end of this announced time schedule.
I do not demand any results and i am already pleased with the performance we ve seen so far. But i do demand to see a solid plan getting up fold,
i do demand to respect our history, our resources, our fans, our players,
everything what Juventus stands for!!
Unfortunately the plan we chose to follow is not only far from the optimal,
but it also seems to be bellow average.
The plan's success was essential to let us reach this time frame.
This plan means that we should make some tactical sacrifices today, to gain strategical benefits tomorrow. This plan requires to take the maximum advantage of our limited resources. This plan needs we have to respect this time schedule and we should use vision to avoid side/back-steps.
As far as the players are concerned, this means not wasting any funds to players who add nothing in the future, or limited performance temporarily.
But invest on our future!!
What have we seen so far??? Only sidesteps that undermine our future!
I have presented the arguments you conveniently chose to ignore.misunderstood, to point this out!
Yes, it is a failure when you buy a player 2-3 times to find a proper one for a certain role in our team.
When you have limited funds and the better quality percentage of your team near to retirement, you cannot afford to throw money away on experiments!!
When you have to close the gap between you and 3 wealthy clubs with the most experienced personnel and with press and political influence to back them up.
You cannot afford to fool around, you have to be nearly optimal to compensate for the lack of attributes you cannot compete with!
We should better save the available funds and dont spend them at all!!
Apart from the overrated primadonnas, the transfer value of a player, indicates his potential/quality/reliability/overall value etc!
The football players market is an offer-request open market.
There is a reason some players are more expensive than others!
We do not have the experimented personnel to work wonders and succeed, where the rest of the teams have failed, discovering the underrated talents, the rest have ignored If we want a good player, we need to pay for him!
Wasting money on no ones or half ones, is not the way to go!
We have done this extensively, partly because of lack of funds/skills/know-how/professionalism/luck and lack of vision!
Some things are not controlled by our hand, there is no one to blame about that.
But some certain choices are accounted to some personnel/persons directly!
This is why some one has to take the blame for a failure!
Because we ought to do better, because we cannot afford failures at this particular time of our history, we cannot afford risks, we cannot afford backsteps, not even sidesteps, we need to do some leaps forward!!
The situation in our defense, particularly reflects the lack of vision and interest from our board!! When they took all those decisions to make those upgrades and addition, what did they have in mind??? Does it look that they had in mind of building a team, with at least 11 top quality players, to compete with the best out there??

Which of the transfer market so far would indicate such vision??
Mellberg for ex, he didnt brought him when we were in a defenders crisis, refusing to pay a minimal fee, since we had the option to sign him for free!
Negating the effects of optimal tactical use!
But why would we buy him this particular year?? What did we have in mind??
Since optimal tactical use is out of question now, it has to be a strategical choice!
Meaning that this transfer will be proved optimal in the long run!
That would mean that Mellberg will grow to be at the same quality status as the rest of our top players, within 2-3 years from now!! That would mean a top defender esential to our team like Sissoko and Amauri! Right?? Wrong, his age wont allow that, he will be a sub at max and even worse, he is a sub even now...
What did he actually added? Greater depth right? Thats the only possible positive thing someone could have said about him and Poulsen! Ok thats fine by, although i would prefer less starters, than more subs, i can live with that.
But happens if we choose to sell him instead?? What did this transfer would offer us in the long run? Nothing? Was it optimal tactically? No! we could avoid at least 4 defeat last, if we had him since the x-mas. Thats a typical example of non optimal, sidestep strategy! This transfer is not included in any serious 5 year plan.
It is just a quick fix! Same and worse is Poulsen, he is not a starter now, he wont be a starter in the future, he is not an optimal tactical or strategical choice and we even spent money, we could have used to sign a better player on him! If we sell Poulsen that would be a backstep, some goes for Almiron and Tiago, but the CL excuse lowers the degree of guilt there!
I sincerely hope that i made my self clear now, regarding the mistakes of our transfer policy! Those mistakes are mistakes even at they day of their birth, Secco's job ends when the season starts! It is not his fault if those player under/over-perform, considering their potential, he should not be accused/praised, because of that. But if he buys a very limited player, invest money and time on him, he is to blame that he wont be able to cope tomorrow against the most competitive ones, that was expected by the day we bought him!
If he buys an injury prone player and gets injured (Andrade), he is to blame, because that was expected. If he sign a player who didnt play for an entire season and that player fails to adapt due to fitness fatigue (Tiago), then again he is to blame because that was expected too! See my point here??
I dont blame Secco for the shake of it, as Jack accuses me of, i blame him for some specific errors he made. Errors that shouldnt have happened, because they where so freaking predictable, even some not specialist could see them coming and would have avoid them!
Secco is trusted with million and he is ought to be optimal, but in fact he isnt even half decent...
If he is not man enough to accept his mistakes, he should at lest be sissy enough to quit, since its painfully obvious that he cant cope at this level!
Unfortunately so far he has only abused the trust our board gave him and wasted our limited funds without regrets or respect...
Душан;1913894 said:
I don't see any reason why should we sell Mellberg.You're saying like we should get at least 4 new defenders.Well that ain't gonna happen Cronios.I never denied that our weakest link is our defense but I just said buying someone for free like Eboue would be a good move.It's not like I said we should buy Bertotto from Venezia.
Did we have a chance to sell him?It was just media talks and who knows if those were true.They talked about it once and it stopped.
Serie B was not any excuse.
I didnt say we have to sell Mellberg, i said we have to sell one of them and i ve presented a reason for each of them. You choose to ignore the rest because you know your point cant be defended there and you are trying to imply things, like i absurdly proposed to 4 new defenders only to discredit me!:frown:
Thats not what i said and you know it, i wrote a long post, in cased you didnt understood what i mean and i only because i respect you that much!
I would welcome Eboue and happily keep Mellberg too. But there has been a time we have to invest on our weakest link the defense! Although we dont have any real option, we do have a lot of non useful players filling our lot, salary cap and starters position. Replacing them demands some sacrifices and vision, our board hasnt showed yet. I hope that we will finally see them this year, just like i hoped last year and previous one! But judging by what i have seen so much, i fear that they are bound to repeat the same mistakes! Following the pattern of their transfer policy so far, we do have some indications of how they are going to move this year too. I want to point out the mistakes, even before we see them, so ppl like Jack wont accuse me, that i blame them no matter what i do!
However i m sure that he will "forget" that their mistake was predictable and intercept, even before it was announced, just like it happened in the past 2 seasons... But i expect from ppl like you and Allen, to remember this discussion!
I will and i promise that if Secco and co change their transfer policy, as promised, i ll praise them! Because i am not biased or pessimist. I only hope that they wont make the mistakes i predicted they will! There is no reason for me to do otherwise.
I only want what its best for Juve. I do understand that some ppl choose to deny reality and only hope for the best, thats their right, but they dont have the right to accuse me of anything.
Other, like Jack are more impassable, they dont really care if we win smth now or by the time their children will already have grandchildren.
I never accused them any lesser fans than the rest, its their right!
But i dont understand why they are so sensitive and flame me, personally when i accuse our board for their deeds, not them our their beliefs, but some of our choices! Even if our approach on this matter differs, it doesnt have to be personal...
Regardless the media rumors, the intentions of our board, is reflected by the lips of our officials and undeniably by their deeds!
I never accused someone because of rumors, but when i see a rumor that seems to respect the pattern, of our policy in a matter, i have the courage to point out my opinion, even before it is made! If our board realize that predictable mistake in the end, then their fault is true and beyond any doubt and that would not be the first time it happened...