American NFL Football (52 Viewers)

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
River is a top 6 or even 5 QB and a bad game doesn't change that - he's had a better year than Brees, for example. And what do you expect, Rodgers or Manning in return for Luck; that is you are gonna lose but not really lose? The whole point of taking a risk is in the potential of winning or losing a lot.
I offered you to play fantasy russian roulette, you chose to stay in the corner and play with your dolls. As I said - all talk, no balls.

- - - Updated - - -

And you are a desperate mofo. :p
I have more than enough firepower to beat you 8 out of 10 times we meet. just got tired of sitting around and wanted to make things interesting. Wanted to give you the chance to put your money where your mouth is ... and there you go.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
River is a top 6 or even 5 QB and a bad game doesn't change that - he's had a better year than Brees, for example. And what do you expect, Rodgers or Manning in return for Luck; that is you are gonna lose but not really lose? The whole point of taking a risk is in the potential of winning or losing a lot.
I offered you to play fantasy russian roulette, you chose to stay in the corner and play with your dolls. As I said - all talk, no balls.
Getting Rivers instead of just dropping Luck isn't that much better. Rivers had a great run in the start of the season, but he's lost steam. Considering his schedule, Stafford doesn't look much worse for the rest of the season. Also, Luck is to Rivers what Graham is to Fleener. ;)

- - - Updated - - -

I have more than enough firepower to beat you 8 out of 10 times we meet. just got tired of sitting around and wanted to make things interesting. Wanted to give you the chance to put your money where your mouth is ... and there you go.
You are so cute. Getting a winning record all of a sudden made you so so confident. :kiss: A shame you won't make the playoffs.
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
Fleener's a top 5 TE for this week. Fact. If you don't agree, give me your top 5.

Also, KCC underperformed.
Saying Fleener is a top 5 TE this week doesn't really mean much - you are always gonna have a top five at the TE position even if your 5th TE scores say 4 pts. The fact of the matter is that at TE there is Gronk and Graham at the top and then a huge drop off to the next level (Gates and Olsen) and then another drop. It's not liek we are talking the #1 TE being just a bit better than the #5 (presumably Fleener).

No, KC didn't under-perform, you just made a bad read. But Ds are like that, there is no guarantee my D will score much better than that either.
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
Getting Rivers instead of just dropping Luck isn't that much better. Rivers had a great run in the start of the season, but he's lost steam. Considering his schedule, Stafford doesn't look much worse for the rest of the season. Also, Luck is to Rivers what Graham is to Fleener. ;)

You are so cute. Getting a winning record all of a sudden made you so so confident. :kiss: A shame you won't make the playoffs.
We'll see sweaty, didn't know ladies like watching football. no go bring me some tea and biscuits :kiss:

P.S. winning record or not, I am just willing to take a chance, all the while being well aware there is always a risk.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
Saying Fleener is a top 5 TE this week doesn't really mean much - you are always gonna have a top five at the TE position even if your 5th TE scores say 4 pts. The fact of the matter is that at TE there is Gronk and Graham at the top and then a huge drop off to the next level (Gates and Olsen) and then another drop. It's not liek we are talking the #1 TE being just a bit better than the #5 (presumably Fleener).
Of course Graham is on another level than Fleener. But Fleener has a great matchup and is into a great streak while Graham has a bad matchup. It makes the big gap smaller.

- - - Updated - - -

P.S. winning record or not, I am just willing to take a chance, all the while being well aware there is always a risk.
You're in a much worse position than me. Even if you win against me, you're still not in the top 4.
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
@acmilan

Out of curiosity, rank the teams in our league.

- - - Updated - - -



Made a bad read. You always crack me up. :kiss:
what does ranking have anything to do with this. Records are all relative due to injuries and general circumstances changing on a weekly basis. you don't rank teams when there are so many, constantly moving parts.
Again, I am not saying there is no risk for me to lose in that bet I offered - I am just willing to take that risk, unlike you.

- - - Updated - - -

Of course Graham is on another level than Fleener. But Fleener has a great matchup and is into a great streak while Graham has a bad matchup. It makes the big gap smaller.

- - - Updated - - -



You're in a much worse position than me. Even if you win against me, you're still not in the top 4.
Mccown has a cupcake of a match-up too. You willing to take the chance of starting him over Luck tomorrow?

If you lose tomorrow you are done, it's as simple as that.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
what does ranking have anything to do with this. Records are all relative due to injuries and general circumstances changing on a weekly basis. you don't rank teams when there are so many, constantly moving parts.
Again, I am not saying there is no risk for me to lose in that bet I offered - I am just willing to take that risk, unlike you.
You just told me that you'd beat me 8 out of 10 times. If you are able to say that without taking match ups into account, I'm sure you could also rank the teams.

I'm not willing to take the risk because the potential loss is bigger for me. You losing against me could likely mean you are eliminated anyway.. I, on the other hand, could still easily go to the playoffs with a loss. But you already know that. :D
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 42)