I'm not knocking KC for getting him, because he is a lot better than what they've had the past 6 years. It's just...........................................................just......................................................................................a 2nd round pick this year and a pick next year that ca be as high as a 3rd
If someone told me 2 weeks ago that the 49ers would be able to get a pick in the first 40 selections of this year's draft for Alex Smith and his 9 million dollar contract, I would have asked for the number of their drug dealer.
When you don't have a QB, yo got no project. When you got no project to build on, what the f-ing hell would you need all those draft picks, especially the ones in the top 3 rounds that got some tangible value? Improve from a 2-14 record onto a 5-11 one?
For a team in KC situation, they couldn't afford to not draft a QB with their top pick, which would have given them very poor return, considering the QB class this year. Let's say they didn't and waited to take that rookie QB with the 34th pick - who do you get there when it's quite likely that Geno Smith and Matt Barkley or any other QBs that may be worth looking at in this draft may well not fall there. Let's say they get Glennon or Nassib with it, do they really get better value for that 34th pick than sending to the 49ers for Smith? Doubt that unless part of their plans for next season or two include pulling Brady 2.0 somewhere in the 6th
Either way, they end up spending at least an early 2nd rounder for a QB who would be nowhere near Smith's level. Now, they at least have a project with a tried and true quantity like Smith at Qb and still have that 1st rounder to build on to it.
Something else, considering the KCs track record of getting top value for their picks - unless you think they have all those early pick year after year by sheer coincidence
- who knows what crap of a player (not just QB) they'd have spent that pick(s) they gave the 9ers anyway. At least now they get a good Qb in Smith.
No losers in this deal, imo.
- - - Updated - - -
Coincidence that it has happened since Harbaugh was there?
Here's the issue. Andy Reid does not like to run the ball. With McCoy, he barely did it, and with Charles, I don't think he's going to alter from his gameplans. He is just that stubborn
Which means that Alex Smith is going to be required to throw the ball at least 10 times more per game than he is used to. Anytime he has to throw over 25 times per game, he runs into problems
not a coincidence but you always have to account that for a good QB to shine and show his actual value, the rest of the team has to be up to scratch too. Doubt even Brady would have made out of that previous 9ers team SB contenders.
Similarly with Smth - he is unlikely to find the same level of ability and talent at KC he had with the 9ers under Harbough but he's shown he can do well when those around him do their job. So, as long as the other pieces of the puzzle fit well together for KC, he can be very good for them - best of what was available anyway. If not and things stay as messy as they are, Smith would fair as well as any other QB in the midst of a chaotic, self-destructing organization.