Amauri "The Immovable Object" Carvalho de Oliveira (10 Viewers)

YasoR17

Mirkofan #1
Jul 4, 2008
7,751
Obviously didn't understand a word of my post
I did, but it didn't make sense. There is no reason Amauri shouldn't be able to score in almost a year. Obviously nothing to do with the service when all the other strikers managed to score, even Giannetti.
So Amauri was the problem. Period.
 

Linebreak

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2009
16,022
I did, but it didn't make sense. There is no reason Amauri shouldn't be able to score in almost a year. Obviously nothing to do with the service when all the other strikers managed to score, even Giannetti.
So Amauri was the problem. Period.
Tell me

Which strikers scored in the following matches

Parma 4-1

Napoli 3-0

Roma 2-0

Udinese 2-1

Palermo 2-1

Lecce 2-0

Bolonga 2-0

Amauri was consistently injured at Juve - which raises another problem at Juve.
 

Linebreak

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2009
16,022
People here are quick to forget

Don't make me remind you
Amauri was great for the first few months at Juve and quickly turned to shit which he has been ever since - we all know that.

But that reminds me of Deigo's story

Krasic is now looking the same

Quagliarella was doing well before his injury - but who knows, maybe he too would have caught the Juve disease.

Matri did well for 3 games and has been anonymous since - is he starting to fade early?

I am saying there's a real problem at Juve at a much deeper level than we all think.
 

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,813
Amauri was great for the first few months at Juve and quickly turned to shit which he has been ever since - we all know that.

But that reminds me of Deigo's story

Krasic is now looking the same

Quagliarella was doing well before his injury - but who knows, maybe he too would have caught the Juve disease.

Matri did well for 3 games and has been anonymous since - is he starting to fade early?

I am saying there's a real problem at Juve at a much deeper level than we all think.
Agreed, but what do you think the problem could be? 5 coaches in 6 years equals multiple staffs for these players to play under. Are you implying that the front office bleeds the same tainted blood?
 

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,813
If thats the case then don't you think the media would have caught wind of it? Its been nearly half a decade since the scandal.

But overall I'm just as curious as you are, there is no way that all these players can decline in their play after a few short months of joining Juve
 

Nenz

Senior Member
Apr 17, 2008
10,472
Amauri was great for the first few months at Juve and quickly turned to shit which he has been ever since - we all know that.

But that reminds me of Deigo's story

Krasic is now looking the same

Quagliarella was doing well before his injury - but who knows, maybe he too would have caught the Juve disease.

Matri did well for 3 games and has been anonymous since - is he starting to fade early?

I am saying there's a real problem at Juve at a much deeper level than we all think.
Maybe none of them were actually the real deal in the first place.
 

Nenz

Senior Member
Apr 17, 2008
10,472
I wouldn't label them all in the same bucket
Its probably right that there is some sort of problem with Juventus. That problem IMO is that we buy good players but don't create an environment for them to do what they need to. Krasic is double marked because there's no creativity in a second striker or left winger which hinders his play. Amauri was always injured and when he wasn't he had below average service. Diego was always on his own, pretty much the same as Krasic being double marked and after half a season of that your confidence will dive.

BUT we're yet to have bought a really proven winner who has played very well consistently over multiple seasons at the highest level. When we do buy someone of that description and he fails then we can properly conclude without doubt that Juventus is the problem and not our buys.
 

Linebreak

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2009
16,022
Its probably right that there is some sort of problem with Juventus. That problem IMO is that we buy good players but don't create an environment for them to do what they need to. Krasic is double marked because there's no creativity in a second striker or left winger which hinders his play. Amauri was always injured and when he wasn't he had below average service. Diego was always on his own, pretty much the same as Krasic being double marked and after half a season of that your confidence will dive.

BUT we're yet to have bought a really proven winner who has played very well consistently over multiple seasons at the highest level. When we do buy someone of that description and he fails then we can properly conclude without doubt that Juventus is the problem and not our buys.
There's part of the problem - Juve generally likes to buy mediocre duds and waste Juve's name on them (Amauri, Diego, Krasic do not fall into this bucket - they are relatively strong players when in form)

Juve wants a Scudetto at a discounted price - they are no longer willing to invest in good players - although they've spent a shit load on rubbish in the last two seasons - Martinez 12m?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 8)